I just can't fathom the logic behind putting bleed immune champs on this path. It boggles my mind
I also enjoyed the Havok on disorient and Ebony Maw on Kinetic Transference. Just great for an already awful reparry quest. Worst piece of EQ content in a very long time for sure, if not the worst ever.
Also don't forget about Bishop who you can't bleed because you will get overload damage from it. What a genius design by the team.
Use colossus easy. Also I think you take damage when a debuff is on him. Passives are different. I 100%ed that quest and didn’t notice any insane damage back from having a bleed passive on bishop. Also I found magik and Claire to be the best options for cav hulking for those that struggle with him. I know I did with doom
Explored 3.1, basically Apoc all the way. AA as horseman also save you a lot of time.
But frankly the 1st run cost me 6 revives on Hulkling, I have no idea how to fight him atm. Then later become easy one shot with CGR, BWCV, SS and….Ronan cheese.
Colossus is incinerate immune so I think he’s a better option than apoc. Just bait that sp1 and gain all them armor ups from the incinerate immunity. Also there’s a Aarkus on that quest so colossus is also good for him.
3.1 was awful... I spent more revives on it than in EOP final week. The #tag champs were useless, and other then apoc (who can't counter all the defenders) also the mutant class weren't that good for that global node. Bishop was one of the worst fights... I even tried the new "reworked" champs Yondu (#tag champs and can remove prowess) but guess what? he still sucks. There are more annoying fights, like maw, kitty, havok and i still have two "fun" paths to complete (the one with doom and the one with Icarus) The path that inflicts disorient on Well-Timed block was just a bad joke probably designed by sadistic trying to brake us. Whoever it was I hope at least it made you laugh.
3.1 is some of the trashiest content I’ve dealt with in a long time. These nodes didn’t respond well when introduced and kabam has continue to ignore players disgust with them. I doubt kabam’s intention for adding these tags was to completely ignore them when selecting attackers but alas here we are… 3.1 needs to be changed.
I started with Disorient path, bringing Angela for Havok. It was rough, but still did it itemless. The rest was easier. Used Hit Monkey (with 10 charges he easily went through bleed immunes), AA, Mags (great for CGR) for paths and Sigil Witch/Claire for boss. AA did most of the work, just melting everything. The secret is to do a well timed block to put stun immunity on cooldown, and then just parry/heavy.
You’re forgetting the red skull with crit resistance on the path that has you generating power drain charges by crits too. Couple that with conflictor and that’s one obnoxious fight
I had to restart that path after red skull fight and just brought doom. He took 3 of the six fights on that path and was much much quicker then using the tagged champs.
Used Apo for all bleed immune champs and Kitty for Bishop. Bishop was still a c**t!
@Cap_Murica With Apoc, did he stun on the first party? I didn't have to reparry at all with him like other mutants and was wondering why.
Apoc ignores shrugging debuffs, which this node does, so he can ignore them :-) he's a great counter for this.
The node says noting about shrugging off debuffs. Says they’re stun immune on their first attack. There’s a difference between shrugging of a stun and being immune to stun. Apoc’s ability to stun everyone on this map makes no sense which is to be expected because this game lacks clarity and consistency.
I think it’s fine; forces you to think outside the box instead of just mashing your best champions. Definitely do-able and adds more depth to thinking.
Nobody thinks it’s very difficult or not doable. It’s just annoying. When there are nodes that benefit you from an action and you put a champ who completely negates that node, why even bother with that node?
I think it’s fine; forces you to think outside the box instead of just mashing your best champions. Definitely do-able and adds more depth to thinking.
I’m sure everyone complaining about them are done them, so of course they are do-able. That is far from the problem, all content is do-able but some content make sense then we have 3.1.
Comments
With Apoc, did he stun on the first party? I didn't have to reparry at all with him like other mutants and was wondering why.
But frankly the 1st run cost me 6 revives on Hulkling, I have no idea how to fight him atm. Then later become easy one shot with CGR, BWCV, SS and….Ronan cheese.
Another favorite? Trying to use Silver Centurion for his slow. Good luck since you need to re-parry.
The #tag champs were useless, and other then apoc (who can't counter all the defenders) also the mutant class weren't that good for that global node.
Bishop was one of the worst fights... I even tried the new "reworked" champs Yondu (#tag champs and can remove prowess) but guess what? he still sucks.
There are more annoying fights, like maw, kitty, havok and i still have two "fun" paths to complete (the one with doom and the one with Icarus)
The path that inflicts disorient on Well-Timed block was just a bad joke probably designed by sadistic trying to brake us. Whoever it was I hope at least it made you laugh.
3.1 needs to be changed.
The node says noting about shrugging off debuffs. Says they’re stun immune on their first attack. There’s a difference between shrugging of a stun and being immune to stun. Apoc’s ability to stun everyone on this map makes no sense which is to be expected because this game lacks clarity and consistency.