MARVEL-lous Matchmaking

AMS94AMS94 Member Posts: 1,776 ★★★★★
edited November 2022 in General Discussion





I know it's the war rating that matters but other factors should also have some sort of weight in deciding matches

Should't allow such alliances to drop their rating at whim, only to trample everyone on their way back up

Comments

  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,560 ★★★★★
    Yeah, that's quite a difference.
  • ThiartcThiartc Member Posts: 285 ★★
    if you wanna run with the big dogs, dont........??????
  • Graves_3Graves_3 Member Posts: 1,512 ★★★★★
    Hero rating means absolutely nothing. War is only fought using 5 defenders and 3 attackers. Anyone else beyond that is immaterial.
  • AMS94AMS94 Member Posts: 1,776 ★★★★★
    People shouldn't be acting like there is no difference between a Master alliance & a Plat alliance
    And it's not just a Master alliance, but a max prestige Master alliance occupying No. 1 spot in the game in terms of hero rating

    And while the Hero rating doesn't matter too much in war, having the biggest possible rosters does matter
    Having biggest rosters in the world opens up possibilities of having all possible counters for whatever defense the opponents have set, while also reducing the attacking counters that the opponents might have for their defense which not just includes the best possible defenders, but also all newer champs at R4 Sig200

    Being number one alliance in the game is a big deal
    And No. 1 shouldn't be competing with No. 675

    This is not their usual war rating
    They are regularly at top of the table every season but probably decided to take it slow last season making them drop tiers, or may be they got dropped due to some shady stuff which they were once infamous for

    Whatever the reason for their drop may be, fact of the matter is that this war rating is not an actual representation of what their war rating should be & the level at which they usually compete

    Good thing is that we aren't sulky about this match
    Got a similar one last season as well & it's something that we've come to expect these days
    I was actually excited to see this bcoz I wanted to see how some of us perform in this situation
    But it's just preferable when alliances are competing at a more even footing
  • ThiartcThiartc Member Posts: 285 ★★
    lol, arent sulky, but you ran straight to the forums with this
  • AMS94AMS94 Member Posts: 1,776 ★★★★★
    Thiartc said:

    lol, arent sulky, but you ran straight to the forums with this

    Last I checked, pointing out something that seems unfair isn't the same as sulking about it
    I actually enjoy such wars but would definitely prefer this in off season
  • WorknprogressWorknprogress Member Posts: 7,233 ★★★★★
    AMS94 said:

    People shouldn't be acting like there is no difference between a Master alliance & a Plat alliance
    And it's not just a Master alliance, but a max prestige Master alliance occupying No. 1 spot in the game in terms of hero rating

    And while the Hero rating doesn't matter too much in war, having the biggest possible rosters does matter
    Having biggest rosters in the world opens up possibilities of having all possible counters for whatever defense the opponents have set, while also reducing the attacking counters that the opponents might have for their defense which not just includes the best possible defenders, but also all newer champs at R4 Sig200

    Being number one alliance in the game is a big deal
    And No. 1 shouldn't be competing with No. 675

    This is not their usual war rating
    They are regularly at top of the table every season but probably decided to take it slow last season making them drop tiers, or may be they got dropped due to some shady stuff which they were once infamous for

    Whatever the reason for their drop may be, fact of the matter is that this war rating is not an actual representation of what their war rating should be & the level at which they usually compete

    Good thing is that we aren't sulky about this match
    Got a similar one last season as well & it's something that we've come to expect these days
    I was actually excited to see this bcoz I wanted to see how some of us perform in this situation
    But it's just preferable when alliances are competing at a more even footing

    NY hasn't been a Master alliance in ages
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • KAYDA_F2PKAYDA_F2P Member Posts: 21 ★
    Everyone knows that many alliances use the break to lose as many wars as possible, to lower their rating before the next season.

    The same alliances also consist of people who think sandbagging in BG is perfectly fine.

    They are just manipulating the system, because they aren't good enough to play with the big guys anyways…
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 5,094 ★★★★★
    You are an Avalanch, they are just security guards. 🏔️👮Bury them
  • WorknprogressWorknprogress Member Posts: 7,233 ★★★★★
    KAYDA_F2P said:

    Everyone knows that many alliances use the break to lose as many wars as possible, to lower their rating before the next season.

    The same alliances also consist of people who think sandbagging in BG is perfectly fine.

    They are just manipulating the system, because they aren't good enough to play with the big guys anyways…

    You can't lower your rating in off-season in tiers 1-5. NY just hasn't pushed war in probably over a year at this point.
  • tusharNairtusharNair Member Posts: 290 ★★
    AMS94 said:

    People shouldn't be acting like there is no difference between a Master alliance & a Plat alliance
    And it's not just a Master alliance, but a max prestige Master alliance occupying No. 1 spot in the game in terms of hero rating

    And while the Hero rating doesn't matter too much in war, having the biggest possible rosters does matter
    Having biggest rosters in the world opens up possibilities of having all possible counters for whatever defense the opponents have set, while also reducing the attacking counters that the opponents might have for their defense which not just includes the best possible defenders, but also all newer champs at R4 Sig200

    Being number one alliance in the game is a big deal
    And No. 1 shouldn't be competing with No. 675

    This is not their usual war rating
    They are regularly at top of the table every season but probably decided to take it slow last season making them drop tiers, or may be they got dropped due to some shady stuff which they were once infamous for

    Whatever the reason for their drop may be, fact of the matter is that this war rating is not an actual representation of what their war rating should be & the level at which they usually compete

    Good thing is that we aren't sulky about this match
    Got a similar one last season as well & it's something that we've come to expect these days
    I was actually excited to see this bcoz I wanted to see how some of us perform in this situation
    But it's just preferable when alliances are competing at a more even footing

    I would say to you what others say to me when i complain about unfair BG matchmaking. If you are completing for same rewards then yeah this is fair....lolzz
Sign In or Register to comment.