Monthly EQ nodes messed up again?

Savage123456789Savage123456789 Member Posts: 793 ★★★
I remember we had a colossus that needed to be bled to take advantage of nodes. Now a nebula that needs to be shocked. I'm not a game designer, so not sure how things work. But is there a way to have the game filter out champs with certain immunities? Like if you know that next month's EQ nodes involve bleeding/shock/poison etc for a particular chapter, filter out champs with those immunities before randomly picking the defenders.


Comments

  • ReignkingTWReignkingTW Member Posts: 2,774 ★★★★★
    Ha, I just did this one. Brute forced it with Warlock.

    Just wrong.
  • BabyMiikeBabyMiike Member Posts: 1,184 ★★★★
    Fr took me forever
  • ButtehrsButtehrs Member Posts: 6,054 ★★★★★
    I mean with 220+ champs it's gonna happen, but it seems to happen alot more lately. Kabam really needs to do some proofreading before they let stuff go live like this.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Malreck04Malreck04 Member Posts: 3,324 ★★★★★
    It’s not that bad, someone doing exploration should be able to do it, her sp1 is easy to dex so you just need to be able to intercept for a few seconds
  • GiuliameijGiuliameij Member Posts: 1,849 ★★★★
    To all people who say it is not that bad. That is not the point of this post. The point is these quests are designed to reward the use of champions that can deal with the nodes. If you then place a defender that can not be hurt by the node it nullifies the design of the quest.
    All OP is asking is for Kabam to look at the defenders when placing them with certain node combinations in the Cav EQ.
    Because placing Nebula here is against its design.
  • Sw0rdMasterSw0rdMaster Member Posts: 1,796 ★★★★


    Because placing Nebula here is against its design.

    Maybe it was placed there intentionally by design?

    Anyways it's just 1 fight and wasn't a show stopper.
  • SHIELD4AGENTSHIELD4AGENT Member Posts: 915 ★★★★
    the Bishop from months ago was way worse than this, it was in the middle of the path. atleast this nebula is in the first fight
  • ReignkingTWReignkingTW Member Posts: 2,774 ★★★★★

    the Bishop from months ago was way worse than this, it was in the middle of the path. atleast this nebula is in the first fight

    Which they acknowledged was odd, said they were going to look into it, and the conversation died off.
  • AMS94AMS94 Member Posts: 1,776 ★★★★★


    Because placing Nebula here is against its design.

    Maybe it was placed there intentionally by design?

    Anyways it's just 1 fight and wasn't a show stopper.
    Yeah it's definitely intentional
    I have been noticing some of these placements in Cav EQ in recent months
    In this month as well there is another which should've there... don't remember which one though
    This one sticks out so much probably bcoz the level of absurdity & difficulty is more than others of similar category
    Every Cav EQ for past few months have had a few fights like this but none have been at the level as this one
  • Rudolph_RaindeerRudolph_Raindeer Member Posts: 321 ★★★
    I didnt even notice that. Just took her down. Need to start reading those nodes :neutral:
  • Jeal79Jeal79 Member Posts: 444 ★★★


    I thought this one was a naughty addition. Sym nullifies your unblockable buff every time you gain it so you can't play the class node the way it's supposed to be played. Ended up having to fight him with a science champ that I'd brought in for the boss
  • Savage123456789Savage123456789 Member Posts: 793 ★★★

    To all people who say it is not that bad. That is not the point of this post. The point is these quests are designed to reward the use of champions that can deal with the nodes. If you then place a defender that can not be hurt by the node it nullifies the design of the quest.
    All OP is asking is for Kabam to look at the defenders when placing them with certain node combinations in the Cav EQ.
    Because placing Nebula here is against its design.

    I'm glad someone gets it, lol.
  • Savage123456789Savage123456789 Member Posts: 793 ★★★
    AMS94 said:


    Because placing Nebula here is against its design.

    Maybe it was placed there intentionally by design?

    Anyways it's just 1 fight and wasn't a show stopper.
    Yeah it's definitely intentional
    I have been noticing some of these placements in Cav EQ in recent months
    In this month as well there is another which should've there... don't remember which one though
    This one sticks out so much probably bcoz the level of absurdity & difficulty is more than others of similar category
    Every Cav EQ for past few months have had a few fights like this but none have been at the level as this one
    If it's intentional then I'm less worried cause then someone is looking at these fights and they might know what they are doing
Sign In or Register to comment.