Clarification needed on the Ban situation!

TheKiryu · March 2023

In latest update it was stated that spend amounts do not matter when issuing bans. But literally in the next sentence it was stated there will be a meeting with purpose to GREENLIGHT A BAN.

One would wonder why a meeting is necessary, if spend amounts do not matter? That does lead me to believe that there are some guidelines in place right now thar does in fact differentiate between users based on spend amount?

Eb0ny-O-M4w · March 2023

I think they meant a greenlight of a ban wave

TheKiryu · March 2023

That is exactly why i made the post. To find out whether they meant something other than what they wrote in the post. As what was written is self contradictory.

Coppin · March 2023

I just want to know the consequences of the not permanent bans, they said they will look into the consequences...

Vanitelia · March 2023

KT1, I can see where you wanted the clarification. I had to re-read it a few times myself. I agree with @Eb0ny-O-M4w. If that's not the case, the theories out there about the rules not applying to high level spenders will be justified and that is very bad news.

ShuGokis · March 2023

I am really hoping this is a error in wording..

Kabam Jax · March 2023

The two sentences are not related in the way you're implying.

The meeting to "greenlight another ban to happen next week" is not related to account-spend. It is to bring the team together to discuss another wave of incursions-related bans, and to see if any adjustments need to be made to parameters. It is more related to the sentence that follows: "finalizing the details on account penalties for the players carried by cheaters and then they will also be banned."

Clarification needed on the Ban situation!

Comments