Options

Should the time lock to obtain dimensional energy for SQ be removed?

WolvieLoganWolvieLogan Posts: 31 β˜…
edited July 2023 in General Discussion
Only if it's a minor server side fix πŸ™‚

Should the time lock to obtain dimensional energy for SQ be removed? 102 votes

Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
86%
Mr_PlatypusSpity68MidnightfoxEliOrSomethingzuffyFredhorst23CropDusterAzizBluestoneArchdemon_MadhanHiphopBatarangrcm2017MaxtheSilentSachhyam257IndioSkay1984Wine_LoverDenslo500ShadowReptileSidDDragon 88 votes
No. Let it be as it is, just like a lazy stroll in the beach
13%
GK_23ForevernarwhalsDfour24ReignkingTWGardoshahmynuts[Deleted User]Dukenpukespidyjedi84MrSakuragiMDxXFREEDOMXKnightOfTheRealmcoolspiderman17_ 14 votes

Comments

  • Options
    PandingoPandingo Posts: 755 β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
    I wonder what kind of results this would get if we did a vote in-game.....
  • Options
    Rudolph_RaindeerRudolph_Raindeer Posts: 273 β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
    It is part of keeping us addicted to this game: having us have to login every day - or miss out πŸ˜–
  • Options
    MackeyMackey Posts: 1,588 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
    I've never understood why they limit it to 1 per day, just give us the option to do it all in one sitting if we so wish, those who don't want to do that, don't have to but they do it all in one day anyway and then complain to Kabam that it wasn't spread out Iver the month, just have some willpower
  • Options
    Chris_SummersChris_Summers Posts: 252 β˜…β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
    It’s just a weeks worth of energy to get in the objectives, we coulda just claimed in one go finished those 7 entries and then came back each week to get the next set of 7 energy to get into the rift quest.
  • Options
    TyEdgeTyEdge Posts: 2,965 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    It should be front loaded to give us all
    The entries with about a week to spare. And the objectives should last all month. Don’t make me do 7 every 7 days.
  • Options
    SgtBallcrusherSgtBallcrusher Posts: 43 β˜…
    It's obviously meant to keep you engaged every day to make you log in with a possibility of you spending. Personally I don't mind some of these techniques to keep development going.. until 2026 when we see input issues resolved πŸ™„
    I really don't mind the timers but I'd much prefer to have the 7 items behind 5 days of timers, something Tyedge was saying I believe. Give us all the items over 20 days or so, so if like me we work 5x14 u have time to do it on weekends. Anywho
  • Options
    AshacekarAshacekar Posts: 1,819 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2

  • Options
    Chris_SummersChris_Summers Posts: 252 β˜…β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
    Ashacekar said:



    See… he gets it. 😳
  • Options
    Ansh_AAnsh_A Posts: 521 β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
    Kabam has themselves admitted that they dont expect people to complete all the content available in the game. I dont see anything wrong with allowing people to finish side quest in a couple of days and focusing on other modes for the rest of the month.
  • Options
    HungaryHippoHungaryHippo Posts: 779 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
    The whole thing is silly. Probably designed by people who don’t play the game in any competitive fashion.

    Between BG, AQ, EQ, SQ (already finished all story content) there is more than enough to do without additional hoop jumping.
  • Options
    WolvieLoganWolvieLogan Posts: 31 β˜…
    Yes. Leave it to summoners if they want to finish the SQ within a day or 2
    Quite interesting to see the inclination of players towards how accessible SQ should be compared to other content. Though the number of members who chose to vote is very little(almost negligible), 90% wanting it to be removed shows the direction of thought.

    This poll may not have tapped onto kabam's interest, but thanks to people who chose to respond.

    On a lighter note - If there were multiple entries viable for SQ like last month, there would be another few threads on early birds getting multiple 6* generic AG. One less bug to worry for kabam and lesser number of posts to respond for forum moderators/admins πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
Sign In or Register to comment.