Why are we only getting 1 Champion this month ?

Just out of curiosity why are we only getting one champion this month ? Is it always like this for the month of September ?

Comments

  • Eb0ny-O-M4wEb0ny-O-M4w Member Posts: 14,009 ★★★★★
    It's a one time thing, to test a new way of buffing characters I suppose
  • BuffBeastBuffBeast Member Posts: 1,075 ★★★★
    I really don’t get how you can think this is a bad thing, there are SO many champs in dire need of reworks and this update is a sign that we might see more of that. And if you already have Iron man, you get to play with a new version of him that can actually compete in the current state of the game. In what world is that bad?
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,392 ★★★★
    BuffBeast said:

    I really don’t get how you can think this is a bad thing, there are SO many champs in dire need of reworks and this update is a sign that we might see more of that. And if you already have Iron man, you get to play with a new version of him that can actually compete in the current state of the game. In what world is that bad?

    don't think anyone in this thread said it was a bad thing. OP merely asked a question
  • CryptkeeperCryptkeeper Member Posts: 5
    BuffBeast said:

    I really don’t get how you can think this is a bad thing, there are SO many champs in dire need of reworks and this update is a sign that we might see more of that. And if you already have Iron man, you get to play with a new version of him that can actually compete in the current state of the game. In what world is that bad?

    I am not saying it is good or bad i am just asking a question. I am a new player and looking back at old releases there has usually been two champions. I was just wondering why is there only one Playable champion this month.
  • SpideyFunkoSpideyFunko Member Posts: 21,941 ★★★★★

    BuffBeast said:

    I really don’t get how you can think this is a bad thing, there are SO many champs in dire need of reworks and this update is a sign that we might see more of that. And if you already have Iron man, you get to play with a new version of him that can actually compete in the current state of the game. In what world is that bad?

    I am not saying it is good or bad i am just asking a question. I am a new player and looking back at old releases there has usually been two champions. I was just wondering why is there only one Playable champion this month.
    because instead of spending the time on another new champ they revamped an old one who desperately needed it
  • Captain_ShipwreckCaptain_Shipwreck Member Posts: 6
    I like the idea of one new champion being released each month and an improvement to one that a lot of people might have but don’t use. That seems like an excellent response to the oft lamented buff program. It can make a lot of people happy who might otherwise lack the ability to chase a new champ but have a kind of crappy one who’s collecting misery dust.
  • BuffBeastBuffBeast Member Posts: 1,075 ★★★★
    Maat1985 said:

    BuffBeast said:

    I really don’t get how you can think this is a bad thing, there are SO many champs in dire need of reworks and this update is a sign that we might see more of that. And if you already have Iron man, you get to play with a new version of him that can actually compete in the current state of the game. In what world is that bad?

    don't think anyone in this thread said it was a bad thing. OP merely asked a question
    Shoot, I misread the tone pretty badly here. Sorry about that to the thread author
  • Iamant1Iamant1 Member Posts: 170
    I think its good too many new champs coming in all the time imo
  • CryptkeeperCryptkeeper Member Posts: 5
    To be honest I do like the idea of 2 new champions Per month. Why couldn’t Kabam just do that and buff an older champion per month?
  • Maat1985Maat1985 Member Posts: 2,392 ★★★★

    To be honest I do like the idea of 2 new champions Per month. Why couldn’t Kabam just do that and buff an older champion per month?

    the work they have done on ironman is essentially the same as making a new champ.
    they could have just added a new ironman but then you know no one has him and old one still sucks.
    this is a very very good thing.

    there is 250 champs in game. i think it is ok for them to slow down and make old useless champs viable.
Sign In or Register to comment.