Options

Regarding kang nerf and hypocrisy

LovingkidLovingkid Member Posts: 330 ★★
edited December 2017 in General Discussion
Why so eager on nerfing kang ?
When there are so many god damn gameplay issues happening everyday and some even for monthes
Why not fix those?
Why not fix the issue where the player is standing in the middle of combo or why not fix the frame rate drop when you backward evading and the opponent still hit you ,there are simply so many which are ruining the overall experience the player base is having
I am tired of all this (removed by mod). From now on im not spending a dime on this game unless you fix the broken game, a 500k rating player just quit in my alliance because he spent 200$ on odins vault and gave every alliance member a ggc and when he opened his 30 crystal and he got kang, he was happy but the next day he read this nerf and lost control and left our alliance he said he simply cant win against these people, he spent real money to get something and when he got it , it became worthless.his final words were how long untill they do something like this again ?
(This message is not for freetoplayer so dont bother to comment if you dont understand)
Post edited by Kabam Sophia on

Comments

  • Armaganon00Armaganon00 Member Posts: 741 ★★
    I agree, fix the game. Make rare champ powerful. If your worried kabam about a infinite stun lock... Dont limber nodes take care of that. Are you really worried that maybe a 100 people who have a rare champ can beat sections of the game.

    If you nerf Kang ,you will be liable to issue rank down ticket per your quote.

    4yaw17tparub.png
  • CoatHang3rCoatHang3r Member Posts: 4,965 ★★★★★
    If those things could be fixed by changing a single value that is easily identified they would be fixed. This rant is like asking why your mechanic couldn’t fix your unknown engine problem because he was able to put air in your tire.

  • LovingkidLovingkid Member Posts: 330 ★★
    I agree, fix the game. Make rare champ powerful. If your worried kabam about a infinite stun lock... Dont limber nodes take care of that. Are you really worried that maybe a 100 people who have a rare champ can beat sections of the game.

    If you nerf Kang ,you will be liable to issue rank down ticket per your quote.

    4yaw17tparub.png

    Very nice share, i dont have kang but if they did something it could benefit some player including my buddy who apparently used a generic and rank 5d him because he was enjoyable to play
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,679 ★★★★★
    Reducing the Stun from 3.5 seconds to 2.4 seconds in order to prevent an exploit that causes the opponent to be Stunned infinitely does not make him any less enjoyable. Unless your enjoyment comes from Champs that gain unfair advantages.
  • LovingkidLovingkid Member Posts: 330 ★★
    edited December 2017
    Reducing the Stun from 3.5 seconds to 2.4 seconds in order to prevent an exploit that causes the opponent to be Stunned infinitely does not make him any less enjoyable. Unless your enjoyment comes from Champs that gain unfair advantages.

    What will stop them coming after SL then, huh?
    After reaching a combo of 50 he hits like a monster and no other champ of the same lvl and rank can do it
    That is unfair advantage as no other champ
    I repeat no other champ has this type of ability
    They wont nerf starlord because probably more then 50% of player base his him as maxed 4* or 5* and there will be massive riot if they did, so they simply attack champs like kang or og deadpool which only handful of player base owns. This is wrong.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,679 ★★★★★
    That's not an unfair advantage. That's a very specific skill set that was explicitly left as it was. It takes a very long combo to mount Damage for SL. Not an infinite Stun from spamming Specials.
  • LovingkidLovingkid Member Posts: 330 ★★
    That's not an unfair advantage. That's a very specific skill set that was explicitly left as it was. It takes a very long combo to mount Damage for SL. Not an infinite Stun from spamming Specials.

    Thats what im saying and what ur saying SL has something "specific" which made him good as the combo rises
    Kang has that too in the form of 3.5 sec stun
    And specific synergy
    They took it
  • BobomanBoboman Member Posts: 716 ★★
    Stop whining children
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,679 ★★★★★
    Lovingkid wrote: »
    That's not an unfair advantage. That's a very specific skill set that was explicitly left as it was. It takes a very long combo to mount Damage for SL. Not an infinite Stun from spamming Specials.

    Thats what im saying and what ur saying SL has something "specific" which made him good as the combo rises
    Kang has that too in the form of 3.5 sec stun
    And specific synergy
    They took it

    He wasn't intended to Stun the opponent permanently. That's not something "special" that was supposed to happen.
  • ViperKingVViperKingV Member Posts: 111
    They Nerfed Gwenpool less than a month ago in a similar situation. If your going to be upset about something it should be the inadequate monitoring of newly released champs and how long it takes to alert the player base.
    I suggest a news feed delivered in real time like global chat. Any game issues, known bugs or issues being investigated could be sent to all players every time they log on.
This discussion has been closed.