I take it back, I’m complaining again about BG’s. Sue me.

2»

Comments

  • SeyuohSeyuoh Member Posts: 333 ★★★
    CesarSV7 said:

    Seyuoh said:



    Genuinely, what data have you gathered that prompted you guys at Kabam to make this change?
    By doing this you’re basically shoe horning people into having only the most simple and easy nukes in their decks.
    You’re taking out the creativity aspect of deck building entirely, and you’re somehow adding even more RNG to the draft phase.
    Whoever gets the most nuke champs throughout the draft, will just win no matter what.
    Why would you revert a change to the points system, that mostly everyone liked and approved of?
    Especially when this mode is already probably the most disliked part of the entire game.
    Genuinely Kabam, this has to be one of the most tone deaf decisions I’ve ever seen.
    I love this game and the mode mostly, but this is honestly just making me not want to play the mode at all.

    Agreed. It feels like they are simply playing with the point system to create some kind of "new" and "fun" experience to the game mode while they actually deliver a reward update.

    This change is huge, speed will be the overall go too during the draft process without even caring about finishing 100% health or utility champs that much.

    I am not daubting it can be kinda fun and exciting for lower tiers; but what about higher tiers? Most nuke metas are for the most part not even welcomed. Now we're talking about nuking point systems regardless the meta.
    When the nuke meta was the way to go, no matter what champs came out- the top 4-5 attackers were always overly relevant. Kate, CGR, Hulkling, and Juggs. (Juggs a bit later on down the line)
    Each match pretty much came to who could play the nuke champ better, or who got the more stall defenders.
    With this change as I mentioned before, any champ that can not do one or the other- will fall to complete irrelevancy in the mode; and will be borderline useless.
    Unless you just don’t really care about winning, in which case you’d use whoever you wanted to use anyway.
  • Alone13Alone13 Member Posts: 287 ★★

    @Alone13 , Klobberin meant just your EMAIL (to make private), not your entire profile. Those are 2 different settings available (right under each other).

    If it's totally private, wouldn’t be able to see prior help requests/posts/ etc, or send you direct msg replies.

    Now ?
  • willrun4adonutwillrun4adonut Member Posts: 6,722 ★★★★★
    Alone13 said:

    @Alone13 , Klobberin meant just your EMAIL (to make private), not your entire profile. Those are 2 different settings available (right under each other).

    If it's totally private, wouldn’t be able to see prior help requests/posts/ etc, or send you direct msg replies.

    Now ?
    Now you're good @Alone13
Sign In or Register to comment.