Are the 9.2 rewards weird to anyone else?

13»

Comments

  • Nameless_IWNameless_IW Member Posts: 1,200 ★★★★
    I totally agreed with the OP. The put too much emphasis ont he T7 mats. But left the champion acquisitions and others stuff lacking behind. As we progress along the story contents. We can't deduct others loots by just including the T7b. We also need more T4a, awakening gem shards, more titan and 7* shards, a 2-3 generic gem would have been nice, but yeah kabam always giving the very least to see if they can get away with it.
  • the_eradicatorthe_eradicator Member Posts: 432 ★★★
    I keep pulling the same damn 7 stars again and again from the basic 7 star crystals due to the RNG also mathematically as I own most of them. It would been better to add nexus instead of the normal crystal cos at this point its needed. Champion acquisition should be targeted more.
    Rank 1-2 gem at this point just feels does not feel adequate at this point.
    Agree with the awakening gem shards as well..
  • Grimmreaper101Grimmreaper101 Member Posts: 14
    TyEdge said:

    Here are some things that jumped out at me:

    1) a weird lack of t4a. If I’m doing my math right, there are about 5.37, and we’ll use 4 for the r4 they’re pushing as the prize of this content (more on that later)

    2) no awakening gem shards. I’m still bummed that I can’t sell 6-star AGs for small amounts of AG shards. To the extent this stuff is reserved for ends of acts, that’s ostensibly a year away.

    3) 3 7-star basics and 1.3 titans, with no nexuses to be found (path rewards, comp and exploration combined)

    4) I guess this is my big question. I can’t figure out who this is for? It seems to try to have something for everyone, but for any given person, that seems like way more misses than hits.

    Most champs who go to r4 are going to make war and BGs more annoying, because defenders can play almost anywhere and attackers are more affected by nodes and matchups.

    It seems like we’re getting the chance to put one shiny trophy to put atop our roster but the rest seems like it’s for new valiants, I guess?

    Is anyone else a bit confused by the announcement?

    I think we have to take into consideration that it's a chapter reward and now a whole act
  • predatorrpredatorr Member Posts: 116
    giving r4 in curtain awards is crazy, I don't understand these people. They want the 9th curtain discovery awards already. These free awards are amazing. Thanks Kabam, may your purse be blessed :)
  • TadzioTosterTadzioToster Member Posts: 104
    Some AG shards would be nice and maybe relic rankup 2->3. But they really looks nice
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,224 ★★★★★
    This sounds more like an expectation vs. reality situation.
  • BeastDadBeastDad Member Posts: 2,260 ★★★★★
    Rewards look right to me.

    Only thing I was hoping for was a Titan Nexus vs. the shards but that was just wishful thinking.
  • DharakDharak Member Posts: 56
    They should have added 7* nexus crystals instead a bunch of stupid shards we already get **** pulls as it is same dupes no new champs or new dupes & 3 1-2 gems would't hurt anyone to add as well since they are hard to come by & no 2-3 gems? i mean WTF! of course no AG either so i won't even bother asking WHY? since it's just going to be a waste of time. It's not like i dislike the whole rewards i mean happy about the amout of gold, catalysts & the opertunity to get a 3rd R4 but still i was expecting a bit more from the 9.2 rewards especially waiting for a whole 6 moths for it's release.
  • SkyfawSkyfaw Member Posts: 263 ★★★
    I’m pleasantly surprised to find out we can r4 a champ of our choosing from 9.2 rewards. Considering 9.1 you couldn’t even get enough resources to r3 a champion.
  • TotemCorruptionTotemCorruption Member Posts: 2,159 ★★★★

  • Rayven5220Rayven5220 Member Posts: 2,704 ★★★★★
    I just want sig stones. 😭
  • phillgreenphillgreen Member Posts: 4,531 ★★★★★

    I was really hoping for 500 7* awakening shards since I'm short that much.

    Same.
Sign In or Register to comment.