Im the only one who think the GC point system is very bad

ariebrklariebrkl Member Posts: 33 ★
in General Discussion
Im the only one who think the GC point system is very bad?
Why you lose too much points from losing a match
7-8 times got to 80 points
Then lose all points very fast to 0
Like whats the point of playing?
Also winning a fight is more of what draft champs you get then skill

Comments

  • _Pez__Pez_ Member Posts: 348 ★★★
    Just you I think. At least at the start of the gladiator circuit, more often than not I find get 1-2 more points for a win than lose for a loss so if you are winning half your games or more you will be slowly creeping up. You seem to be suggesting you should be progressing up a ladder with more losses than wins?
  • JohnnooooooJohnnoooooo Member Posts: 259 ★★★
    Day 2 I got to 101 points, day 3 managed to get to 163, then faced literally 2 modders in a row (an R2 dpx beat my R3 attuma in 19secs, and his R2 deathless thanos beat my R4 onslaught in 40 secs from what I remember) I just on a mad tilt back down to 40 odd points.. now smoothly back up to 207 where I shall mostly park or float about to get my super daily event rewards..
    Win some you lose some
  • JohnnooooooJohnnoooooo Member Posts: 259 ★★★
    edited May 4


  • JohnnooooooJohnnoooooo Member Posts: 259 ★★★


  • dv99999dv99999 Member Posts: 230 ★★
    edited May 4
    ariebrkl said:

    Im the only one who think the GC point system is very bad?
    Why you lose too much points from losing a match
    7-8 times got to 80 points
    Then lose all points very fast to 0
    Like whats the point of playing?
    Also winning a fight is more of what draft champs you get then skill

    I though only me, lol. Lost much time for nothing.
  • Hulk808Hulk808 Member Posts: 257 ★★
    Yeah, just you. 👍🏻
  • Chuck_FinleyChuck_Finley Member Posts: 1,826 ★★★★★
    edited May 5
    I think this is why they are looking into weighted match making and taking into account consecutive losses in the future.

    Battlegrounds structurally is set up similar to how Madden Mobile used to be configured years ago. I got relatively good at it (better than BGs for sure). But if you got on a run of wins, your competition threshold went up. Get on losing streak, and they would throw you a bone or two so that you didn’t feel like you were getting beat to a pulp.

    There were two things they did differently that I appreciated. 1) if you were facing someone higher up in the ranks and lost, that loss didn’t count as much as losing to someone in your own rank or lower. That made it easier to stay in and try to pull off the upset. (Understand, this was based in rank, not roster). 2) the first few rounds of their victory track was bots… and not very good ones. So players just trying to figure out the game could still play the mode without getting trounced.
  • victor158victor158 Member Posts: 179 ★★
    Chuck_Finley said:

    I think this is why they are looking into weighted match making and taking into account consecutive losses in the future.

    Battlegrounds structurally is set up similar to how Madden Mobile used to be configured years ago. I got relatively good at it (better than BGs for sure). But if you got on a run of wins, your competition threshold went up. Get on losing streak, and they would throw you a bone or two so that you didn’t feel like you were getting beat to a pulp.

    There were two things they did differently that I appreciated. 1) if you were facing someone higher up in the ranks and lost, that loss didn’t count as much as losing to someone in your own rank or lower. That made it easier to stay in and try to pull off the upset. (Understand, this was based in rank, not roster). 2) the first few rounds of their victory track was bots… and not very good ones. So players just trying to figure out the game could still play the mode without getting trounced.

    they already make losses count less if you lose to someone much higher than you. its just not noticeable at low levels cause everyone is the same amount of points. i saw a match today where someone with 600 points matched someone with 200 points and the higher guy only won 2 points. but 99% of people in gc are playing at a level where everyone is gonna have the same amount of points so you always win/lost around 16 points
  • BKSwisherSweetBKSwisherSweet Member Posts: 238 ★★
    PT_99 said:

    Chasing 100 points before deadline for radiance isn't very enjoyable unless you have big deck and skills to match up with competitors.

    So, in other words, spend more if you are not good enough.. Classic Kabam!
  • PT_99PT_99 Member Posts: 6,171 ★★★★★
    Heavenlydemon_06 said:

    Well i have a very good deck at the start it is easy to win 3,4 matches continuously but then suddenly two pro comes with most rarest and higher upgraded champ and before you understand what happened you are back again on zero. ( My experience)

    Show us your deck 👀
  • dv99999dv99999 Member Posts: 230 ★★
    edited May 5
    Heavenlydemon_06 said:

    Well i have a very good deck at the start it is easy to win 3,4 matches continuously but then suddenly two pro comes with most rarest and higher upgraded champ and before you understand what happened you are back again on zero. ( My experience)

    Same here. And when you won with some good champions you have, they will be dissapeared from your choices.I am imaging about A casino system
  • Sachhyam257Sachhyam257 Member Posts: 1,362 ★★★★
    PT_99 said:

    Heavenlydemon_06 said:

    Well i have a very good deck at the start it is easy to win 3,4 matches continuously but then suddenly two pro comes with most rarest and higher upgraded champ and before you understand what happened you are back again on zero. ( My experience)

    Show us your deck 👀
  • SquammoSquammo Member Posts: 637 ★★★
    When I first heard about the radiance 100 and 200 milestones I have to admit I actually thought we only had to score that specific amount of points added up. I think that would be much more doable and enjoyable for the majority of not so hardcore BG players. So basically there’s the tracker in the objective and every time you win a match those points get added, but you don’t lose the points you lose in your regular BG score. Maybe this would be something someone at Kabam could look into?
  • Asher1_1Asher1_1 Member Posts: 1,091 ★★★
    edited May 5
    How many R3 & R4 u have ??

    This is BG season 28 , it took you a very small time to come to this scoring conclusion 🤣
  • Ayden_noah1Ayden_noah1 Member Posts: 2,329 ★★★★★
    Squammo said:

    When I first heard about the radiance 100 and 200 milestones I have to admit I actually thought we only had to score that specific amount of points added up. I think that would be much more doable and enjoyable for the majority of not so hardcore BG players. So basically there’s the tracker in the objective and every time you win a match those points get added, but you don’t lose the points you lose in your regular BG score. Maybe this would be something someone at Kabam could look into?

    I think having a separate milestone to get 100 and 200 points would be make summoners play more to try and get the points. Right now if you can't get on a huge win steak, the 200 points will look out of reach. This would create frustrations for a lot of summoners to try to reach the milestone.
Sign In or Register to comment.