Options
I wonder if kabam used AI to help with this ban wave

There's clearly been a huge screw up here, and ai being wrong so often makes me wonder, did their tool use ai somehow to figure out who to ban? It wouldn't be the first time a company used ai, had it screw everything up and then had to deal with the fallout of the ai's dumbass mistakes.
5
Comments
My guess is they took modding waaay more seriously this time than they usually do (because having people modding like this freely and claiming that radiance is way more detrimental now than it used to be before with the outdated BGs store since that one didn't impact the economy as much as radiance does) so aside from the fact that they had to deal with more modders, I'm assuming they inspected every single account closely and banned even more this time around. When it comes to modders, the obvious ones aren't the ones you have to worry about, it's the subtle ones that try their best to make everything seem legit.
If I'm wrong then I'll take the L, but I have a strong feeling this isn't a mistake.
Rich the man had an ex alliance member told him he got banned. But it’s the trust game do you trust them or not? It’s a very difficult position to be in for us and kabam.
Ratio is probably 75-85% lies/genuine bans and 25-15% unjustified ban.
Ratio is probably even less and the people who know they’re innocent have come out, not even 5% have probably come out and said this isn’t fair yet.
I don't see a single permanent ban post.
And if there are permanent, 99.999% chance it's a legit ban.