Options

Everything

DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
edited July 10 in Bugs and Known Issues
Idk wth y'all creators think, the matchmaking in bgs is beyond horrendous. In gold and facing off with multiple r3 7*s, laughable, there's already multiple complaints about cheating. On top of it, you give the defenders multiple buffs. Take all of that nonsense out and make it a straight up fight. The **** beyond ridiculous. Straight cashgrab game. It used to be fun.
And why can't you go to settings? Make the **** make sense. That's why the majority of the community said **** this game. I've played since it damn near came.out but now it's just ignorant. Talking about banning cheaters, that's a joke.
Post edited by SummonerNR on

Comments

  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 9,600 ★★★★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    Idk wth y'all creators think, the matchmaking in bgs is beyond horrendous. In gold and facing off with multiple r3 7*s, laughable, there's already multiple complaints about cheating. On top of it, you give the defenders multiple buffs. Take all of that nonsense out and make it a straight up fight. The **** beyond ridiculous. Straight cashgrab game. It used to be fun.
    And why can't you go to settings? Make the **** make sense. That's why the majority of the community said **** this game. I've played since it damn near came.out but now it's just ignorant. Talking about banning cheaters, that's a joke.

    You played since it came out and a roster full of 7r3s is a problem?.…
  • DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
    Never said that dipstick, the matchmaking is bs. I definitely don't have a roster full of r3s . I'm not a whale. Make bgs straight up head to head. **** the buffs for the defenders and equal the playing field.
  • DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
    BringPopcorn you're probably working for kascam.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 9,600 ★★★★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    Never said that dipstick, the matchmaking is bs. I definitely don't have a roster full of r3s . I'm not a whale. Make bgs straight up head to head. **** the buffs for the defenders and equal the playing field.

    So you want BGs to be arena matches?
  • DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
    You have to accept the fight, each player chooses their defenders and attackers, remove all the buffs for defenders, make the matchmaking in equal terms and see how much happier and better reviews the game would get. The **** is ridiculous.
  • DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
    Way different than arenas.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 9,600 ★★★★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    You have to accept the fight, each player chooses their defenders and attackers, remove all the buffs for defenders, make the matchmaking in equal terms and see how much happier and better reviews the game would get. The **** is ridiculous.

    No buffs no nodes, a straight up arena fight? Lol
  • DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
    I'm speaking for the whole community I promise you!
  • DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
    You damn right, no buffs, they don't even have nodes in bgs smart one. Laughable. Make it a straight up fight. None of the power gain meta B's that's been the past two seasons or Regen. Straight up fights. If you can't do that, put similar players in the matchmaking, not whales versus ftp.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 9,600 ★★★★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    I'm speaking for the whole community I promise you!

    Am I part of the community and your idea is terrible, so you are not speaking for me.
  • DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
    Would be the one weirdo to disagree. Like I said, you probably work for kascam.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 9,600 ★★★★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    Would be the one weirdo to disagree. Like I said, you probably work for kascam.

    Or you are not good enough to play BGs...
    Everything is possible!
  • DOEDOE504DOEDOE504 Member Posts: 35
    I'm definitely good enough. Put your bottom dollar on that. Go to global chat right now. It's a **** show. Tighten up kascam.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 9,600 ★★★★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    I'm definitely good enough. Put your bottom dollar on that. Go to global chat right now. It's a **** show. Tighten up kascam.

    No you are not, and yes its clear you belong in global.
  • MrSanguiniMrSanguini Member Posts: 195 ★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    You have to accept the fight, each player chooses their defenders and attackers, remove all the buffs for defenders, make the matchmaking in equal terms and see how much happier and better reviews the game would get. The **** is ridiculous.

    The defender nodes are there because without them, every fight would be way too easy and every deck would have the exact same champions. Nodes allow different champs to be more or less useful in different seasons, bringing variety. If you really want a no-nodes experience, just play arena.
  • MrSanguiniMrSanguini Member Posts: 195 ★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    I'm speaking for the whole community I promise you!

    Nope, the only thing majority of the community would agree with is having better matchmaking. In fact, it's on Kabam's roadmap. But removing nodes from BGs is silly.
  • phillgreenphillgreen Member Posts: 4,668 ★★★★★
    DOEDOE504 said:

    Never said that dipstick, the matchmaking is bs. I definitely don't have a roster full of r3s . I'm not a whale. Make bgs straight up head to head. **** the buffs for the defenders and equal the playing field.

    Gave you a lol because I haven't heard someone get called a dipstick for 20 odd years.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 9,600 ★★★★★

    DOEDOE504 said:

    Never said that dipstick, the matchmaking is bs. I definitely don't have a roster full of r3s . I'm not a whale. Make bgs straight up head to head. **** the buffs for the defenders and equal the playing field.

    Gave you a lol because I haven't heard someone get called a dipstick for 20 odd years.
    I gave him a lol cause his idea is stupid and laughable
  • KanoooKanooo Member Posts: 127
    Agreed to at least 98%.

This discussion has been closed.