**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

Unfair this (I hope an answer)

HenriqueSCCPHenriqueSCCP Posts: 413 ★★★
This to share accounts, many who play MCOC work and study, we are not all children, we have responsibilities (or you want us to play at work and risk losing your job), I have a friend who He plays me when I can not and I play for him when he can not.
In AW and AQ, many can not go straight to remove a node, so we ask some friends who can play at the moment.

Comments

  • Cryptic_CobraCryptic_Cobra Posts: 532 ★★★
    God your as bad as seatin... don’t publically announce that you break rules.
    Regarding your post though, the “right” thing to do is suffer as an alliance and delay taking the node down til you yourself can do it.
  • IOSJasoNIOSJasoN Posts: 643 ★★★
    The answer is.. You have just straight up admitted to account sharing which is a violation of the TOS.. Thank you for your honesty on the matter.. Expect kabam to deal with this appropriately.. :smiley:
  • Kabam LyraKabam Lyra Posts: 2,936 ★★★
    HenriqueSCCP,

    We've made it very clear that account sharing is against the rules, so regardless of the reason you should not do it.
This discussion has been closed.