The level of reward (last milestone) should have been based on uncollected title rather than prest

Jayfighter88Jayfighter88 Member Posts: 28
edited May 2018 in Suggestions and Requests
Last milestone or higher reward level for events like dungeon should be based on level of skill. And game has one milestone to check their level of skill...There are some players whose prestige is high but they are unable to become uncollected till date.... i know that kabam has already explained their actions... but i want to know what community thinks and want to suggest kabam for design of upcoming events like this

The level of reward (last milestone) should have been based on uncollected title rather than prest 19 votes

Last milestone should be based on prestige
10%
GroundedWisdombuffajr 2 votes
Last milestone should be based on uncollected title
47%
Mr_PlatypusbloodyCainKossukoseAnonymous346Lt_Magnum_1aWildeCatZsirhcZDareDvlDanVoltolos 9 votes
Last milestone should be based on both
42%
NevvBBahamutAckataBGCats73Jayfighter88IBlueShiftIAl_AhadHKGNKenshir0 8 votes

Comments

  • Lt_Magnum_1Lt_Magnum_1 Member Posts: 639 ★★
    Last milestone should be based on uncollected title
    Prestiege is not a good indicator on player skill. Being Uncollected is.
  • phillgreenphillgreen Member Posts: 4,139 ★★★★★
    edited May 2018
    Prestige is terrible for everything except AW/AQ and Uncollected is only a choice made by those to spend time in story mode.

    Spending my way through Act 5 grants me no more status than ranking the right champs and buying featured crystals until I hit the jackpot. Both can be achieved with money and no skill just as much as talent and luck.

    Dungeons are effectively a solo event (since alliances are not a prerequisite) that is designed to encourage people to use their whole roster instead of their top team and no one who is not ready for dungeon 6 will score points there anyway.

    Everyone should have the same cutoff so the spenders, grinders and solo guys can play on the same field.
  • Jayfighter88Jayfighter88 Member Posts: 28
    Last milestone should be based on both
    @phillgreen you are right in terms of equality.... But whenever they want to bifurcate achievable reward, at that time would should be the criteria???

    Talking about spending time on any mode of the game: this is their prime focus to attract more people and make them play all the day.....

    Why I choose uncollected title: because we don't have any other trustworthy titles available and kabam has already divided players based on this title....

    So whenever they want to separate players based on some criteria than that criteria should be this kind of title not prestige that's all i want to say.

    Spending more money: players who are spending more money can achieve anything in the game, they might not have issues against any of the methods....
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,581 ★★★★★
    Last milestone should be based on prestige
    Prestige is not just about AQ. It's also reflective of time and effort. It takes time and effort to acquire Champs and Rank them sufficiently to qualify. You could make purchases, but you could also do the same for 5.2. To be fair, they're both subjective, but Prestige is a metric that can reflect progress, whereas you need to be sufficiently progressed in order to beat The Collector, but it was just the point they decided to "up the ante", so-to-speak. Realistically, it's just a Quest in Act 5.
  • Mr_PlatypusMr_Platypus Member Posts: 2,779 ★★★★★
    Last milestone should be based on uncollected title
    GroundedWisdom wrote: »
    Prestige is not just about AQ. It's also reflective of time and effort. It takes time and effort to acquire Champs and Rank them sufficiently to qualify. You could make purchases, but you could also do the same for 5.2. To be fair, they're both subjective, but Prestige is a metric that can reflect progress, whereas you need to be sufficiently progressed in order to beat The Collector, but it was just the point they decided to "up the ante", so-to-speak. Realistically, it's just a Quest in Act 5.

    And realistically prestige is just a random number they pull out when designing a champ.
    Uncollected is a better way of showing who’s capable and who isn’t, much better than prestige which for the most part just shows how lucky you are with your crystals.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,581 ★★★★★
    Last milestone should be based on prestige
    Mr_Platypus wrote: »
    GroundedWisdom wrote: »
    Prestige is not just about AQ. It's also reflective of time and effort. It takes time and effort to acquire Champs and Rank them sufficiently to qualify. You could make purchases, but you could also do the same for 5.2. To be fair, they're both subjective, but Prestige is a metric that can reflect progress, whereas you need to be sufficiently progressed in order to beat The Collector, but it was just the point they decided to "up the ante", so-to-speak. Realistically, it's just a Quest in Act 5.

    And realistically prestige is just a random number they pull out when designing a champ.
    Uncollected is a better way of showing who’s capable and who isn’t, much better than prestige which for the most part just shows how lucky you are with your crystals.

    It's not about capable. It's about cumulative progress.
  • Mr_PlatypusMr_Platypus Member Posts: 2,779 ★★★★★
    Last milestone should be based on uncollected title
    GroundedWisdom wrote: »
    Mr_Platypus wrote: »
    GroundedWisdom wrote: »
    Prestige is not just about AQ. It's also reflective of time and effort. It takes time and effort to acquire Champs and Rank them sufficiently to qualify. You could make purchases, but you could also do the same for 5.2. To be fair, they're both subjective, but Prestige is a metric that can reflect progress, whereas you need to be sufficiently progressed in order to beat The Collector, but it was just the point they decided to "up the ante", so-to-speak. Realistically, it's just a Quest in Act 5.

    And realistically prestige is just a random number they pull out when designing a champ.
    Uncollected is a better way of showing who’s capable and who isn’t, much better than prestige which for the most part just shows how lucky you are with your crystals.

    It's not about capable. It's about cumulative progress.

    And you’ve got to be capable to progress...
    Maybe I’m biased because my prestige was 5300, but hey it’s not my fault that 90% of my 5*s are completely useless and not worth taking to R4.
  • Mr_PlatypusMr_Platypus Member Posts: 2,779 ★★★★★
    Last milestone should be based on uncollected title
    GroundedWisdom wrote: »
    Mr_Platypus wrote: »
    GroundedWisdom wrote: »
    Prestige is not just about AQ. It's also reflective of time and effort. It takes time and effort to acquire Champs and Rank them sufficiently to qualify. You could make purchases, but you could also do the same for 5.2. To be fair, they're both subjective, but Prestige is a metric that can reflect progress, whereas you need to be sufficiently progressed in order to beat The Collector, but it was just the point they decided to "up the ante", so-to-speak. Realistically, it's just a Quest in Act 5.

    And realistically prestige is just a random number they pull out when designing a champ.
    Uncollected is a better way of showing who’s capable and who isn’t, much better than prestige which for the most part just shows how lucky you are with your crystals.

    It's not about capable. It's about cumulative progress.

    And you have to be capable to progress...
    Maybe I’m biased because my prestige was at 5300 but I’m more capable then many that were above that 5500 cutoff but it’s not exactly my fault that 30 of my 35 or so 5*s have been complete ****.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,581 ★★★★★
    edited May 2018
    Last milestone should be based on prestige
    Uncollected is somewhat arbitrary itself. The only reason it means something is that was the point they decided to give a special Reward. Otherwise it's just another Quest. The problem is, Prestige is an average derived from advancement, and it's more useful for gauging progress at different points, whereas Uncollected merely separates people into 2 categories. Those who have finished Completion of 5.2, and those who have not. That is much less of a gauge because of how broad it is.
  • Mr_PlatypusMr_Platypus Member Posts: 2,779 ★★★★★
    Last milestone should be based on uncollected title
    GroundedWisdom wrote: »
    Uncollected is somewhat arbitrary itself. The only reason it means something is that was the point they decided to give a special Reward. Otherwise it's just another Quest. The problem is, Prestige is an average derived from advancement, and it's more useful for gauging progress at different points, whereas Uncollected merely separates people into 2 categories. Those who have finished Completion of 5.2, and those who have not. That is much less of a gauge because of how broad it is.
    Still better than prestige.
    But I’ll leave it at that as you’ll just sit saying the same thing in different ways over and over and over and over again, and you won’t change my mind that prestige is a good metric of showing progression, it’s just a random number assigned to champs seemingly at random that affects AQ scores.
  • Jayfighter88Jayfighter88 Member Posts: 28
    Last milestone should be based on both
    Whatever the reason @GroundedWisdom brother but prestige cannot replace skill... no matter how many and how strong champs you have, they are garbage without proper skills

    And skilled players should be given preference
  • Jayfighter88Jayfighter88 Member Posts: 28
    Last milestone should be based on both
    Kabam should look into this....
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Jayfighter88Jayfighter88 Member Posts: 28
    Last milestone should be based on both
    @MoiraD you are right brother... ranking meh champion is waste of resources
Sign In or Register to comment.