Ad0ra_ wrote: » Midnightfox wrote: » I hope there is some decent compensation planned. This is an extreme situation, and it's going to require a lot of serious consideration on our part. We will be doing something for sure, but I don't know what just yet.
Midnightfox wrote: » I hope there is some decent compensation planned.
Ad0ra_ wrote: » SiriusBreak wrote: » @Ad0ra_ - I have to ask now that devices have been brought up. Is the random screen flip mid battle an Android thing, or does that happen with iOS devices too? It drives me nuts every time it decides to just flip without warning. At 1st I thought it was aggressive play that caused it. But no. No. It occasionally just happens when the phone is sitting still on a load screen. I wish screen lock prevented it, but alas no. On a final note, thanks for sticking with us, and the causal chat here. I can only imagine the frustration on that end. P.S. - Not looking for a fix, just confirmation if it happens with iOS. As I may go for an iPad down the road as a second device. I won't buy an iPhone though (yes, I'm being redundant lol) I've never personally experienced this on my iPhone, but that doesn't mean that it's only an Android device thing. Thank YOU for being willing to casually chat with us
SiriusBreak wrote: » @Ad0ra_ - I have to ask now that devices have been brought up. Is the random screen flip mid battle an Android thing, or does that happen with iOS devices too? It drives me nuts every time it decides to just flip without warning. At 1st I thought it was aggressive play that caused it. But no. No. It occasionally just happens when the phone is sitting still on a load screen. I wish screen lock prevented it, but alas no. On a final note, thanks for sticking with us, and the causal chat here. I can only imagine the frustration on that end. P.S. - Not looking for a fix, just confirmation if it happens with iOS. As I may go for an iPad down the road as a second device. I won't buy an iPhone though (yes, I'm being redundant lol)
Snizzbar wrote: » Lifeswicked wrote: » Snizzbar wrote: » 5:47pm here. Saturday is a grinding day for me and it's been down all afternoon 😥😥😥 Kiwi bro? Chur chur Chur 2 much cuz
Lifeswicked wrote: » Snizzbar wrote: » 5:47pm here. Saturday is a grinding day for me and it's been down all afternoon 😥😥😥 Kiwi bro? Chur chur Chur 2 much cuz
Snizzbar wrote: » 5:47pm here. Saturday is a grinding day for me and it's been down all afternoon 😥😥😥 Kiwi bro?
Lifeswicked wrote: » Please change your game down msg to check back in a few hours as shortly is an out right lie
Drummer16 wrote: » DNA3000 wrote: » Drummer16 wrote: » I am a Senior Software Architect of 12 years...can you guys hire me? This is sad because I can get AWS or GCP support on the phone in the matter of a few minutes at my job. If GCP is down, then you guys are going to get quite a big reimbursement, so spread the love. What's strange is that you guys are blaming Google, when they have no indication of a service disruption today: https://status.cloud.google.com/ so what's the prob? The GCP status board only lists outages and critical disruptions. It does not list functional problems that are workload-specific. A while back I had an issue with an EC2 hosted cluster. The client was getting bursts of low IOPS to Windows guests for a long time. This caused an invisible, unreported, zero event log occurrence of volume shadow snapshot block clearing backlog to occur, which I can't even find articles about anyone ever troubleshooting. This caused all volume management to stall, which meant no VSS anything, no disk management anything, nada, zip, zilch. Touching anything involving volume management would hang the volume management services and require a reboot, which did not fix the underlying problem. We only figured out the problem when we cloned the instances and left them idle during troubleshooting, and after two *days* the idle clones automagically fixed themselves when not under load. No one can explain to me what can take that long to automatically resolve. The world is a complicated place. Yea, but that's a flaw with the infrastructure's architecture you designed, not the provider like they are blaming. You should have had a failover cluster in that situation, and you would have had time to figure out the problem. This game has been plagued by long outages and scaling issues for years, and it's not that hard to build a redundant, scalable architecture at all levels. Hell, they make enough money in a week to solve this problem. That's the beauty of AWS and GCP. Sure, they'll have to pay more for the redundancy, but you don't have to deal with this BS all the time.
DNA3000 wrote: » Drummer16 wrote: » I am a Senior Software Architect of 12 years...can you guys hire me? This is sad because I can get AWS or GCP support on the phone in the matter of a few minutes at my job. If GCP is down, then you guys are going to get quite a big reimbursement, so spread the love. What's strange is that you guys are blaming Google, when they have no indication of a service disruption today: https://status.cloud.google.com/ so what's the prob? The GCP status board only lists outages and critical disruptions. It does not list functional problems that are workload-specific. A while back I had an issue with an EC2 hosted cluster. The client was getting bursts of low IOPS to Windows guests for a long time. This caused an invisible, unreported, zero event log occurrence of volume shadow snapshot block clearing backlog to occur, which I can't even find articles about anyone ever troubleshooting. This caused all volume management to stall, which meant no VSS anything, no disk management anything, nada, zip, zilch. Touching anything involving volume management would hang the volume management services and require a reboot, which did not fix the underlying problem. We only figured out the problem when we cloned the instances and left them idle during troubleshooting, and after two *days* the idle clones automagically fixed themselves when not under load. No one can explain to me what can take that long to automatically resolve. The world is a complicated place.
Drummer16 wrote: » I am a Senior Software Architect of 12 years...can you guys hire me? This is sad because I can get AWS or GCP support on the phone in the matter of a few minutes at my job. If GCP is down, then you guys are going to get quite a big reimbursement, so spread the love. What's strange is that you guys are blaming Google, when they have no indication of a service disruption today: https://status.cloud.google.com/ so what's the prob?
Ad0ra_ wrote: » Hey everyone, I just checked in with the team and while I don't have an update on a time for you, I can say that this is a server issue and we are currently in contact with Google trying to get it resolved. I'll update you when I know more!
Ds_magic_Law wrote: » When game is back?
Kade7175 wrote: » Don cheadle for sure. Hes amazing as rhodie. Terrance howard i dont think would have melded well with everyone.
Buckleyjpk77 wrote: » I’m still waiting on jubilee
Ad0ra_ wrote: » DanveerKarna wrote: » Do we get half hour timers for AQ time that we have lost? @Kabam Miike It's been 12 hours (almost) since the AQ was started and the team isn't able to clear section 1! Please compensate the maintenance at least with 30 mins timers for today! TIA We don't have info on what compensation is going to be yet, but we will have to take a lot into consideration. These are pretty extenuating circumstances, and we know that.
DanveerKarna wrote: » Do we get half hour timers for AQ time that we have lost? @Kabam Miike It's been 12 hours (almost) since the AQ was started and the team isn't able to clear section 1! Please compensate the maintenance at least with 30 mins timers for today! TIA
NikoBravo wrote: » Did Anonymous conduct a DoS attack or did Tyler Durden blow up your servers using fat ladies lipo fat residue turned into nitroglycerin?