is it worth wasting resourses on aq map 5
hungama01
Member Posts: 108
Sinc mod have not given us a transparent reply on Aq issue.
So is it worth running map 5 and wasting our tressury resourses on map 5.
hope we dont get tier down if we play map 5...
Lot of confussion now which map in aq to run...
I would like to play free map 3 but afraid skipping map 5 will get us tier down....
can someone suggest???
So is it worth running map 5 and wasting our tressury resourses on map 5.
hope we dont get tier down if we play map 5...
Lot of confussion now which map in aq to run...
I would like to play free map 3 but afraid skipping map 5 will get us tier down....
can someone suggest???
1
Comments
We want a clear statement for all of them,thanks.
@Kabam Miike @Ad0ra @Kabam Valkyrie @Kabam Vydious @Kabam Vydious @Kabam Zibiit @Kabam Ahab
1) If we run it, seemingly we have to spend resources on useless, broken ****. But:
2) If we don't run it, will we not be considered in the remediation / compensation. Because they said they need the
data points from the completed week. Presumably to see how all the alliances fare and then come up with some
kind of applicable compensation curve to apply.
If they are doing option 2, then it may still make sense to run the maps. But, it's all assumption and conjecture. Their response thus far has been completely ambiguous. A simple confirmation of WTF is going on would go a long way. Some transparency please? Let us know before round 1 ends today so we can decide? Anyone? Anyone? Beuller?
we keep on asking about this...
please let us know which map we sud do if you are taking current aq as compensation we would not have run map 2....
this is not fair to many alliance which did map 2 so that we cud safe our tressury resource...
we are screw now...
this is frastuating.....