Aw cheating
Reptilekeeper
Member Posts: 44
As predicted the post on the top alliances cheating was removed and not a word from kabam.
Please could you tell us why it was removed kabam and what your actions will be?
Please could you tell us why it was removed kabam and what your actions will be?
-5
Comments
The 2* wars were great when they ran, so there's no need to imagine as we did them until kabam realised no one was spending
Exactly...but instead of suggesting changes your only answer is "they cheat, we need answers."
The only possible changes I see they could make is kabam start the timer like Aq so if you wait to fix your war match you would be losing time, also maybe a matching system that only matches you with another alliance no more than 5-10 places university or below, that would then mean that matches could take ages to be matched.
Great job...that's a start.
How about a simplification of the rewards system like they did for AQ? Prestige led to a lot of kicking among alliances under the old system. Under the new system with the stratified tiers there has been more stability. Making there be less tiers in war with the same types of shards in each tier would also seem to eliminate a lot of the problems with the current system. I'm not opposed to change...but simply saying they are cheating is not the right way to go about it either.
As to the duration to enter the Placement Phase, it's up to Kabam on what they think is a reasonable timeframe.
The subject that is being discussed now is a closed few fixing it in there favour.
So completely different
But, the now half-dead 2* War side agreement isn't? That's some logic.
The 2* wars were done on the kabam game chat and the match was done by kabam, if you drew a top alliance you would still lose as in them days they were the only ones with r5's there was no secret groups where fixing was done. The war was won or lost on skill and in fact the only losers were kabam as 0 items were ever used. The first roll out of the very original wars which I was lucky enough to be in one of the few alliances Involved were great as the nodes were very weak so it was more you v them, since then it's been made into a money making machine.
Why is it our job to suggest changes? We are not developers.
Under his world view, the 2-star collusion wars were the best because anyone can do it. No planning is involved. Just show up and wing it.
With the new collusion scheme, planning is required and it is far easier to implement in certain tiers than others. Still far more difficult to implement than the 2-star collusion scheme but the point is that it is easier to implement in certain tiers (mainly tier 1).
Thus not everyone can do it.
In other words, it isn't about the collusion; it is about availability. The scheme isn't available to him and therefore it is wrong.
The OP is arguing that the top alliances are cheating because they do not face each other in wars. I'd argue it is just a bad design with the current war system (whether it be how matchups are made, rewards are too disproportionate, or a combination of many factors).