losing war ONLY because of diversity...
JamesBula
Member Posts: 27 ★
Dear Kabam,
We had more attacker kills, mode defender kills, more map exploration and 1 defender remaining. Still we lose TO diversity. How were the opponents more skilled than us?
See attached pictures... what the duck?!
We had more attacker kills, mode defender kills, more map exploration and 1 defender remaining. Still we lose TO diversity. How were the opponents more skilled than us?
See attached pictures... what the duck?!
3
Comments
Be more diverse.
You have to weigh how much impact a double will have on the outcome. Frankly, I think only 2 or 3 champs are useful doubles and even that depends on the map difficulty. In some tiers, every defender goes down anyway, often with boosts and not with revives, so might as well place a diverse def.
3 bg 83 diversity is pathetic. We have 90 diversity with 2 bg.
If you want to grow as an alliance you’ll need to ramp that. As you climb tiers you’ll see people have diverse good defenses.
They were better organised with their defence, which takes more communication and time input than throwing in any defenders you want. They were the better alliance and deserved to win
Choose an officer, he/she handle the rest ;
Open an excel and write there every champions by their classes
Write every member's name and their defense team another clumn
Let's say someone of your group's name and team is " Megavok = hyperion - gwenpool - stark spider - black widow - scarlett witch "
Change those champions name color in champions list.
This is my way to handle all diversity in the whole alliance. I have an excel for each group. I can track everyone, I can see which members are breaking the diversity. I suggest everyone who is struggling with diversity this method, it's very useful.
Here is a visual for easier understanding.
I wish you better luck next time.
Nah this is the worst.
Lost by 20 points is absolutely the closest I've ever seen thus far
1. You win by scoring more points, not by claiming to have more skill.
2. You placed a ton more duplicate defenders than they did, which implies you placed a lot more of the strongest defenders (because if you placed a lot of duplicate poor defenders that's just dumb). And yet, even though you put up more of your strongest defenders than they did, they were able to kill those defenders at almost the same kill/defeat ratio as you. You had 449 attack bonus to their 441. It was much harder for them to get those 441 bonuses than for you to get your 449, because they placed a weaker defense.
To put it another way, they took a gamble placing diverse for diversity points and hoping you didn't kill them to easily. They won that gamble, because you were not skillful enough to make them pay for that weaker defense. That is an entirely legitimate way to win.
As an aside, 83 is a horrible diversity level for that tier of war. You are less likely to have as much stacked defenders capable of generating tons of kills (and the score reflects this) so your return on investment for all those duplicates is relatively low. You should probably be at least above 110 to reduce the chances of costing yourself too much diversity points without enough attack bonus (reduction) return. You should be able to either place a defense that diverse or work on ranking a defense that diverse over time without weakening that defense by a lot.
This hurt. We missed out on plat from the loss. We had two dominos in different bgs get 12 kill's a piece. So like 18 kill's ment nothing to us.