Options
Seatin's double-Cyclops video....
gannicus0830
Posts: 606 ★★★★
Further proof that Kabam is either grossly out of touch with the community, enjoys pissing us off, or both.
https://youtu.be/H_A5LjCbPWk
https://youtu.be/H_A5LjCbPWk 39
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
anyone going mental cos both cyclops' are in the 3 star crystal?
You don't have to accumulate 10k shards over (best case) a month to acquire 3 stars, and nobody uses them for anything beyond arena grinding.
just because it takes longer to gather 6 star shards it doesnt mean you gonna pull ONLY the best heroes out of it!
But the effort to achieve said shards does imply a certain level of usefulness. And neither Cyclops or about a third of the basic pool meet that expectation.
dexman,Ive been playing for 10 months now...very short time if you ask me,but Ive seen so many I mean so many people hacking monthly quests senslessly to accumulate 6 shards
Seen plenty of 70-80k accounts with double even triple 6 stars on their profile pages...Unfortunately opening a 6 star cyrstal isnt any different than opening a 3-4-5 star crystal....there will be junk heroes there will be god tier heroes...every single thing in this game is RNG based...no point to expect only the best of best heroes in the 6 star crystals...
there will be 6 star groot,colossus etc as well,we have to deal with it
In nearly every other aspect of existence it is. The concept of greater effort yielding greater reward is nearly an inherent part of every endeavor.
Kabam's logic; greater effort only gets you a chance to gamble for a greater reward in one of the most stacked-against you casinos I've ever seen.
It's not about having two Cyclops'...which might as well be the same champion, but it's about not added champions like venom and Carnage, and the other great champions in this game. People have to grind months just for a shot at iron fist and Jane foster and hulkbuster and you get the point. The game could be much more fun and enjoyable if everyone had a Corvus or a domino or a venom. They seem to think balance is defined by having bad and good champs which then alienates the player base by supplying us with gds champs. The player base defines balance by having a champ that can counter the abilities of another champion.
thats how gambling works.
thats exactly how all lootboxes, all poker machines all forms of gambling work.
you bet larger sums, you can either win really big or you just lose more.
its RISK v REWARD.
you want the potential reward of a new 6* GOD, you take the risk you get a trash can.
you dont want to take the 15k risk,
open basic crystal.
chance of a particular champ is smaller but you are risking less.
If only we could convince Seatin to make a global warming video, it would prove climate change is happening to the doubters.
I can't express how wrong this is. This is literally the maximum amount of wrong that anyone could be about the game. Handing everyone everything like that is how to completely destroy a game.
Gaining 5*s in the beginning was so much slower and the champs were so much worse. You can really tell who's been playing for 3+ years
That's literally the whole point though. You grind, for however much time it takes to accumulate shards, for a CHANCE at a great champ. Flooding the game with nothing but top tier champs would just ruin the balance.
Yupp. Think SL was only decent one at time. Magik still sucked hard. Think cap marvel was second best iirc. I remember pulling ronan, then magik, then juggs and thinking I should quit 😂😂
Yep I remember being so jealous when someone in my alliance had a duped R4 Cpt marvel and duped R4 juggs