DemitriM wrote: » every single hero will be added to 6 star hero crystal in time anyone going mental cos both cyclops' are in the 3 star crystal?
gannicus0830 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » every single hero will be added to 6 star hero crystal in time anyone going mental cos both cyclops' are in the 3 star crystal? You don't have to accumulate 10k shards over (best case) a month to acquire 3 stars, and nobody uses them for anything beyond arena grinding.
DemitriM wrote: » gannicus0830 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » every single hero will be added to 6 star hero crystal in time anyone going mental cos both cyclops' are in the 3 star crystal? You don't have to accumulate 10k shards over (best case) a month to acquire 3 stars, and nobody uses them for anything beyond arena grinding. just because it takes longer to gather 6 star shards it doesnt mean you gonna pull ONLY the best heroes out of it!
Dexman1349 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » gannicus0830 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » every single hero will be added to 6 star hero crystal in time anyone going mental cos both cyclops' are in the 3 star crystal? You don't have to accumulate 10k shards over (best case) a month to acquire 3 stars, and nobody uses them for anything beyond arena grinding. just because it takes longer to gather 6 star shards it doesnt mean you gonna pull ONLY the best heroes out of it! But the effort to achieve said shards does imply a certain level of usefulness. And neither Cyclops or about a third of the basic pool meet that expectation.
Drooped2 wrote: » Dexman1349 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » gannicus0830 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » every single hero will be added to 6 star hero crystal in time anyone going mental cos both cyclops' are in the 3 star crystal? You don't have to accumulate 10k shards over (best case) a month to acquire 3 stars, and nobody uses them for anything beyond arena grinding. just because it takes longer to gather 6 star shards it doesnt mean you gonna pull ONLY the best heroes out of it! But the effort to achieve said shards does imply a certain level of usefulness. And neither Cyclops or about a third of the basic pool meet that expectation. Effort to acheive means has to be good? Lol no that's simply not true
gannicus0830 wrote: » Drooped2 wrote: » Dexman1349 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » gannicus0830 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » every single hero will be added to 6 star hero crystal in time anyone going mental cos both cyclops' are in the 3 star crystal? You don't have to accumulate 10k shards over (best case) a month to acquire 3 stars, and nobody uses them for anything beyond arena grinding. just because it takes longer to gather 6 star shards it doesnt mean you gonna pull ONLY the best heroes out of it! But the effort to achieve said shards does imply a certain level of usefulness. And neither Cyclops or about a third of the basic pool meet that expectation. Effort to acheive means has to be good? Lol no that's simply not true In nearly every other aspect of existence it is. The concept of greater effort yielding greater reward is nearly an inherent part of every endeavor. Kabam's logic; greater effort only gets you a chance to gamble for a greater reward in one of the most stacked-against you casinos I've ever seen.
gannicus0830 wrote: » Further proof that Kabam is either grossly out of touch with the community, enjoys pissing us off, or both.
mum_m2 wrote: » The game could be much more fun and enjoyable if everyone had a Corvus or a domino or a venom.
Drooped2 wrote: » Worknprogress wrote: » I think 5* shard availability was much lower than 6*s early on as well It was mostly selling 4s at the start 5 shards were terrible I got storm 4 out of my first 5 five star crystals
Worknprogress wrote: » I think 5* shard availability was much lower than 6*s early on as well
mum_m2 wrote: » DemitriM wrote: » every single hero will be added to 6 star hero crystal in time anyone going mental cos both cyclops' are in the 3 star crystal? It's not about having two Cyclops'...which might as well be the same champion, but it's about not added champions like venom and Carnage, and the other great champions in this game. People have to grind months just for a shot at iron fist and Jane foster and hulkbuster and you get the point. The game could be much more fun and enjoyable if everyone had a Corvus or a domino or a venom. They seem to think balance is defined by having bad and good champs which then alienates the player base by supplying us with gds champs. The player base defines balance by having a champ that can counter the abilities of another champion.
Worknprogress wrote: » Drooped2 wrote: » Worknprogress wrote: » I think 5* shard availability was much lower than 6*s early on as well It was mostly selling 4s at the start 5 shards were terrible I got storm 4 out of my first 5 five star crystals Gaining 5*s in the beginning was so much slower and the champs were so much worse. You can really tell who's been playing for 3+ years
DoctorJ wrote: » Worknprogress wrote: » Drooped2 wrote: » Worknprogress wrote: » I think 5* shard availability was much lower than 6*s early on as well It was mostly selling 4s at the start 5 shards were terrible I got storm 4 out of my first 5 five star crystals Gaining 5*s in the beginning was so much slower and the champs were so much worse. You can really tell who's been playing for 3+ years Yupp. Think SL was only decent one at time. Magik still sucked hard. Think cap marvel was second best iirc. I remember pulling ronan, then magik, then juggs and thinking I should quit 😂😂