No Blade in Dhampir Crystal

When this video is slowed down, Blade doesn’t appear once. Wasn’t there a 20% chance to get Blade? He doesn’t even show up.

Comments

  • Bruinsfan8510Bruinsfan8510 Posts: 289
    I’m pretty sure the characters that appear in the reel doesn’t mean anything, he’s in there....I’m almost 100% sure Kabam already know what champ you’re going to get haha
  • Drooped2 said:

    The spinner has zero relevance to the pull. So

    So they can’t show him at least? I mean come on it is a featured crystal. Give us a little hope
  • I got him once out of 3 crystals bud
  • FhfjghhggggjfhfjgFhfjghhggggjfhfjg Posts: 2,966 ★★★★
    The reel means nothing
  • Ultimatesaber32Ultimatesaber32 Posts: 728 ★★
    The reel is meant to instill false hope. (similar to all these skrulls.) it really means nothing.
  • Arbiter2426Arbiter2426 Posts: 344
    Why do people post this as if it it matters, if your getting 5*s you should know the reel does not matter
  • Le_Marv_8Le_Marv_8 Posts: 83
    I feel that this is just lazy work that a crystal with supposedly 20% or whatever percent to not have at least show a picture of a character. It doesn't matter if you get him or not, it doesn't matter if the reel matters or not cause having the character not appear in the reel would suggest that the odds to get him is 0%.

    What proof do you have otherwise?

    Just because the company say so? Just because you didn't pull him in your own attempt? Just because someone started a belief that 'the reel doesn't matter'?

    Guilty or not, anyone with blood on their hands near a murder scene is guilty.

    Simply, just put in a glimpse of blade whether the reel matters or not. Otherwise, it appears like the crystal did not give out the drop rates it is promised and appearance count.

    If appearance doesn't count, the game should look like minecraft characters, but no, this game is beautiful (obviously appearance matters) so be slightly less lazy and make sure there is at least one blade in the reel when anyone opens the dhampir crystal?

    Let complains be on the pulls and drop rates instead of this pointless debate.
  • UmbertoDelRioUmbertoDelRio Posts: 1,421 ★★★
    Le_Marv_8 said:

    I feel that this is just lazy work that a crystal with supposedly 20% or whatever percent to not have at least show a picture of a character. It doesn't matter if you get him or not, it doesn't matter if the reel matters or not cause having the character not appear in the reel would suggest that the odds to get him is 0%.

    What proof do you have otherwise?

    Just because the company say so? Just because you didn't pull him in your own attempt? Just because someone started a belief that 'the reel doesn't matter'?

    Guilty or not, anyone with blood on their hands near a murder scene is guilty.

    Simply, just put in a glimpse of blade whether the reel matters or not. Otherwise, it appears like the crystal did not give out the drop rates it is promised and appearance count.

    If appearance doesn't count, the game should look like minecraft characters, but no, this game is beautiful (obviously appearance matters) so be slightly less lazy and make sure there is at least one blade in the reel when anyone opens the dhampir crystal?

    Let complains be on the pulls and drop rates instead of this pointless debate.

    "[...] it doesn't matter if the reel matters or not cause having the character not appear in the reel would suggest that the odds to get him is 0%."

    It doesn't matter... If the reel matters or not... Cause... Having the character not appear... In the reel... That doesn't matter... Suggests...

    My head hurts, mate. That's some serious cognitive acrobatics.
  • UmbertoDelRioUmbertoDelRio Posts: 1,421 ★★★

    Le_Marv_8 said:

    I feel that this is just lazy work that a crystal with supposedly 20% or whatever percent to not have at least show a picture of a character. It doesn't matter if you get him or not, it doesn't matter if the reel matters or not cause having the character not appear in the reel would suggest that the odds to get him is 0%.

    What proof do you have otherwise?

    Just because the company say so? Just because you didn't pull him in your own attempt? Just because someone started a belief that 'the reel doesn't matter'?

    Guilty or not, anyone with blood on their hands near a murder scene is guilty.

    Simply, just put in a glimpse of blade whether the reel matters or not. Otherwise, it appears like the crystal did not give out the drop rates it is promised and appearance count.

    If appearance doesn't count, the game should look like minecraft characters, but no, this game is beautiful (obviously appearance matters) so be slightly less lazy and make sure there is at least one blade in the reel when anyone opens the dhampir crystal?

    Let complains be on the pulls and drop rates instead of this pointless debate.

    "[...] it doesn't matter if the reel matters or not cause having the character not appear in the reel would suggest that the odds to get him is 0%."

    It doesn't matter... If the reel matters or not... Cause... Having the character not appear... In the reel... That doesn't matter... Suggests...

    My head hurts, mate. That's some serious cognitive acrobatics.
    Also, you can't make a claim with no foundation whatsoever and then ask people to prove the opposite.
    That's some kindergarten level of logic.

    Look, please try to understand the following:

    The reel does not matter.

    You say you understand that, but if we both read your comment, we both know that you didn't quite undertand that concept yet.

    If the reel doesn't matter... Why should it represent anything that matters?
  • Hey there, the reel that appear when opening the crystal is an animation that displays possible rewards from the crystal, but does not have any bearing on what is available from the Crystal itself. Due to randomness or time constraints, it may not be able to display everything that could be received from the Crystal, but that doesn't mean that they aren't available.
This discussion has been closed.