**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
More control for Leaders and Officers in AQ and AW
gone_again
Posts: 81 ★
I was just wondering if Kabam would ever think about giving Leaders and Officers more control over AQ and AW. By this I mean would it be possible for us to allocate members to specific groups.
I personally think this would be a HUGE improvement to the game.
Many thanks for your time
I personally think this would be a HUGE improvement to the game.
Many thanks for your time
5
Comments
These suggestions do not add value to those alliances.
It would be nice for the leadership to be able to assign members to battle groups for both AW and AQ.
I am not in favour of Officer (I am one in my alliance) having too much control. Currently, a member can be kicked out by just one Officer. I would have thought at least a second Officer to activate kick confirmation.
Members in the alliance should work together for the benefit of the alliance. If they don't listen, you already has the power to kick.
I am reading some alliance even demand members share access login for others to move in AW & AQ. Or buy a 'seat' in the top alliances to get T4CC etc.
The whole idea is to prevent abuse and control.
Just my thoughts.
There is an element of being conversant on the champ abilities with node buffs. A player who is meticulous with it can get good understanding on champ placement but still lacking the practical experience of actually having played with champs. E.g. An awakened rank 4 SIM. Which tile do you place him?
In alliance where Officer's champ strength is low (and I have seen quite number) compared with Members, do you really think the Officer gives orders? Maybe ...
I do agree that it really does depend on your abilities with champs that should take precedence over the ranking/rating of a champ and it really does depend on who you fight best with to maximise your abilities.
And an Officer isn't there to give orders as such in our alliance, its to help out with placement and managing groups, and general 'running' of the alliance. We also don't kick a member without full discussion between officers and leader, unless of course the said member is being abusive or horrid to another member, then its instakick.
A feature I do like that Kabam have recently brought in is the auto placement if a member accidentally doesn't place a champ in AW, saves 'wasting' a champ - good call Kabam!!
We assign members to certain groups for AQ/War its not that difficult to figure out with players who can listen or follow directions. Communication is simple honestly.
We do the same thing. Its really easy to figure out.
Why would you even want to play in that alliance? I'm a grown adult I can figure out what champs to use. Some players play better with specific champs so someone else telling me how to play wouldn't fly. Sounds like a power control issue honestly.
Choosing a players champs is taking it a bit too far I would certainly agree with that, and I agree that there are specific champs people play better with. The treasury history would be a good idea too and being able to lock out a player would be handy too.
We as an alliance don't just kick for kickings sake, we try to give people chances, if they don't take those chances then we will release them from the alliance.
Thanks to everyone who has commented, its nice to get other peoples oppinions :-)