**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.
AW matchmaking
rwhack
Posts: 1,047 ★★★
Season just started and we have matched the same opponent back to back. Last season we matched 3 alliances two times each. Soooo....is there anyone else who doesn't recognize how absolutely poorly conceived this "system" is.
0
Comments
First two weeks can be random based on war rating, prestige etc. In second half of the season you can match mostly based on season standings (E.g Master 1 vs 20, 2 vs 19) and ignore prestige, alliance war rating and other factors. Just need to make sure alliances that move into Master during that playoff phase are tested at the Master level before season ends
We’ve been in master every season. Try and keep up.
Maybe no one watches sports. Kabam would reward Mount Union College as national champs if they went undefeated in division III if say Clemson,Ohio State, or Alabama lost 1-2 games even though they would crush Mount Union.
If that makes sense to you you’re a Mount Union alum.
Prestige and alliance rating has nothing to do with war. We will have a top 3 with two nobodies who play no one and Kenob again. You try taking a steady diet of top 3 in AW every war and tell me how fun it is. When you award masters and top 3 it's supposed to be because you're good...not because Kabam lets you match no one.
Alliances are competing for the same rewards but the way matches are determining the degree of difficulty is in no way similar.
We are two seasons into this and your system creates multiple repeat opponents and makes no sense. Back to back +55/-6 match ups are proof of that. Pure cash grab. I suspect it’s being done manually.
@Kabam Miike
I can't think of a system designed by someone who has any level of competency that has you face the same alliances all season or have nothing but +56/-6 wars.
They’re using PI like it has something to do with war. Great news, you can suck at war and finish in masters or even top 3