And_Another_One ★
Reactions
Comments
-
You imply that having 4 r4’s is a prerequisite to being competitive in the game, but I disagree. There’s no real competitive advantage between an r4 and r3. Furthermore, the advantage typically diminishes with skill (Brian could get cav with 4* and low rank 5* champs whereas many players would struggle to do so).
-
I love this idea! It seems as though you and I are along the same lines with the solo competitive content ideas. The randomised node pool of 64 should be the same for both players (i think you might have mentioned that) to avoid players feeling disenfranchised if they got a lacklustre pool of nodes. I prefer your idea…
-
perhaps I should mention that I have a 6* spider-gwen and CA:IW, so these can be discounted from consideration.
-
Title says it all. Just spent a fiver on it without realising the rates were the old rates. It’s somewhat surprising that this has happened twice in a row now.
-
i had no problems on that fight, despite thinking that i would.
-
Another problem is the summer of pain event. I solo’d it with spider-gwen, but it took absolutely forever (it’s a 400 hit run so chances of a parry bug are high). I pity those who don’t have the tenacity to persist with it and complete this week’s challenge.
-
I agree, initially I was very surprised and glad to receive the compensation, but now that the problem is persisting and my alliance member lost two of his champs to parry issues on AQ map 5, i’m beginning to wonder whether the compensation was enough.
-
is beast actually any good? i have him 6*…