RWW12 ★
Reactions
Comments
-
Yes. Im noticing this also
-
This happened to someone in my ally as well. He had venom the duck down to 6%. When the game came back up, it was like he never started at all.
-
Just go them. Better late than never.
-
One suggestion for fixing the piloting situation and the issue of bumping a platinum2/3 alliance down into fights with gold1 opponents could be a 24 hour ban for the individual offender for the first offense. That will hurt the summoner as well as the alliance that now must fight with one less attacker and 10 less…
-
I have an r4 magik at sig 200 that gets put on defense every war. Typically before the war I will bring her up to lvl 5 md, place my defense and then reset my masteries without md. Are those players who had all 5 points in md when it was locked able to remove the 5 points and use them elsewhere during this time frame? Can…
-
And I can understand not letting people purchase any more mystic cores or not letting people use those codes to unlock higher levels of md, but I don’t understand why they wouldn’t let people that already have those things purchased test the new mastery.
-
They’re going to refund you for everything you’ve unlocked as of 8/31.
-
@"Kabam Lyra" thank you for responding. So even if I have all 5 levels unlocked and already paid for, because I did not have points in it at the time it was locked I’m not able to test it? Are you saying that someone that has all 5 levels unlocked and had all 5 levels in use when it was locked can test this mastery out at…
-
@GroundedWisdom no, spending gold or units to add points to a mastery you have already paid to unlock isn’t the same thing. They’re going to refund the units or loyalty spent on the mastery cores that were used to unlock the mastery and it’s different levels, not the units spent to rank it up every time you took points out…
-
If we’re to test md out with the changes, shouldn’t we be allowed to test it at the different levels that we’ve already paid to unlock? I would like to see the difference between level 4 and 5 now since I’ve already paid for both. When they refund me for all 5 levels, I’d like to know if I should repurchase all 5 levels…
-
It’s says they’re going to lock the ability to “purchase any more levels of md.” It does not say it will lock our ability to use it if we’ve already purchased it. Purchasing a level of md is completely different from placing mastery points in it. The snapshot they take has nothing to do with whether you’re using it or not…
-
I understand the intent of he node. However, notice the difference between the two screenshots of the same node. One clearly has the biosting active while the other does not. Why would one assume that the debuff had not been cancelled out by the dangersense?
-
-
-
-
@"Kabam Miike" @"Kabam Wolf" @"Kabam Vydious" @"Kabam Zibiit" @"Kabam Loto" I sent a ticket in prior to the start of war but they didn’t get back to me yet.
-
As you can see, tier 4 bracket with tier 3 nodes.
-
-
-
@"Kabam Miike" what about just offering more mastery points at the end of new content. Maybe next act that comes out can have one for completion and another for mastery? That way you keep the energy levels the same but increase the amount of mastery points we can have. Or how about just getting rid of the minimum point…
-
What’s up with the glory store? Why are the revives sometimes not available and why are the crystals showing either the incorrect name or the incorrect picture? @"Kabam Miike"
-
Update: right now the revive is there, but the level 4 health pot looks like a glory crystal. Which one would I get if I bought it, the glory crystal or the health pot?
-
I see what you’re saying and I appreciate the insight of introducing other designs as better and not just different. I do think from a design standpoint as well as a player standpoint the idea of “rewarding” a tie by not reducing rating is beneficial to all. It’s easy to do from a designer standpoint and it’s a satisfying…
-
@"Kabam Vydious" I really hope you will continue to participate in this conversation as it is the epitome of what these forums should be about. We have some great input here for building a better product for everyone and I hope you can appreciate that and do something productive with it.
-
@DNA3000 I understand what you’re saying about the war rating and the problem that leaving the rating the same could cause. In my opinion though, in the event of a tie I think they could easily create a protocol that doesn’t deduct any rating from either alliance. Clearly these two teams were evenly matched and probably…
-
@"Kabam Miike" @"Kabam Wolf" @"Kabam Vydious" @"Kabam Loto" @"Kabam Pertinax" @kabam anyone @kabam Bueller?
-
@RedRooster I think we could argue forever about what kabam intended and what was implemented, but it’s just semantics that are diluting the original post. What ever their intent/implementation was it clearly wasn’t good enough and I feel like we agree on that. The purpose of this post was for a moderator to provide a…
-
@RedRooster I have to disagree when you say that defender rating was not implemented as a tie breaker. While you may not feel that way, kabam has said on many occasions that it was introduced as a tie breaker and is still meant to be a tie breaker (just like diversity). Those are their words, not mine. While i do agree…
-
Of course there will always be a minuscule chance for a tie in any competition. If the defender rating for both teams was the same I would accept the tie. But they’re not. And then yes, the second part of the result where both teams lose is just ignorance on their part. They obviously didn’t think about this kind of thing…
-
I sent you a message in line.