StolenNameGuy ★
Reactions
Comments
-
Agreed. An alliance's competitive ranking shouldn't be changing outside of competitive 'seasons'.
-
So...we get screwed on aw start time and now we get screwed during the short window I have to play. Kiss me first, kabam.
-
Outstanding arrogance. Congratulations on your 'better run alliance' to go along with your lifestyle and real world obligations that aren't disadvantaged by this change. We're an international group of long-time friends and alliance mates who happened to find a start time that worked for our schedules that is no longer an…
-
Apparently your work schedule and commute is different than mine. Congratulations on having a lifestyle that doesn't negatively impact your ability to enjoy the game with this change in start time. Please don't try and diminish my concern just because you don't share it.
-
^ this. If we have zero control over start time (and therefore end time), we will have several people whose work schedules prevent them from playing the last several hours of war.
-
What was it About?
-
I don't even know if it's necessary to limit a free 1k daily loyalty to those in alliances. Who cares if a person without an alliance can earn a free 4* UC in a year? ...and I forgot one issue in my post. Reduce the champ recharge times, dole out 1k daily loyalty, and the entire help mechanism becomes irrelevant. Has…
-
Why is this still an issue? Add 1k loyalty to the daily calendar and GET RID OF 'HELP' ALTOGETHER. Some days it seems I spend more time waiting for the help button press to register than I spend fighting in the arena.
-
Contact support...but I suspect you're screwed. They're not going to expend the effort to assist you.
-
YES! Why is help even still a thing in this game? It's nothing more than a waste of time and a source of frustration for players. Today I'm pressing help and waiting for 10 seconds, watching the little wheel spin while the game decides whether or not to register my button press. Recognizing this isn't a democracy, but I'm…
-
Question for anybody in this beta group - did you have a private chat group or forum section for discussion about the beta with kabam?
-
I have a simpler suggestion. Stop hiding cheaters behind the protection of 'privacy'. There are no real world consequences to identifying an in game name, so it's not as if it's being done to comply with legal requirements. It's an arbitrary rule that kabam has set and refuses to amend or ignore. Even more frustrating is…
-
I started typing a comment and decided against it. Now, that draft text shows up every time I come to this thread, so I'm just going to post this instead of accidentally sending that post. Mods, please feel free to delete this post. :)
-
@DNA3000 thank you for your response!
-
On a 'rank up week', we would score between 25 and 30 mil. Thats all the milestones and a little extra. The following week, we would score between 20 and 25 mil and rank down. I don't recall where we would place, but the 20k+ t4b shards on a rank up week and the full t4b on a rank down week were handy for those of us who…
-
What's a guy gotta do to get an answer around here?
-
Are the rewards for ranking up and down theoretically covered by the increased rate of accumulating glory? We would get 20k+ t4b shards when we ranked up and a full t4b when we ranked down the following week. Will this new system provide an advantage or a disadvantage to us?
-
It's insane that kabam feels it's appropriate to punish an entire alliance for the actions of one, but fails to issue a ban to that one? Sounds like protecting the cheater at the expense of the rest of the alliance to me. And don't give me this privacy **** as an excuse. They have no problem advertising who's banned on the…
-
One might wonder if the stronger alliance has that low rating naturally or if Kabam helped them by lowering it for them. We could be seeing the side effect of Kabam's solution to AW cheating. Pretty crappy for the OP's alliance.
-
I'd say "unbelievable" and shake my head...but no, this screwup is completely believable. GG, kabam.
-
Yes.
-
Everybody who ranked AA in the time between a moderator saying 'working as intended' and @"Kabam Miike" correcting that moderator should get a rank down ticket. The rest of you chose to rank your champ knowing it was providing an unintended advantage. Life's rough - wear a helmet.
-
I'm not holding my breath waiting for any meaningful action against account sharing from Kabam. When they throw around a word like 'egregious', it's a clear sign that they're leaving themselves a way out for when they decide not to take action against particular individuals...for whatever reason they choose. They will tell…
-
When will Kabam learn from past mistakes and start a real beta test program before implementing changes like the sentinel change? I mean a real beta test, not like the LC/Rulk 'beta' where the surveys weren't even available to some participants?
-
Classic Kabam. Last few hours of the first aw season and the game craps the bed.
-
I'm sure if you edit it to say something negative about kabam, a moderator will be by shortly to delete it for you. :)
-
You guys don't actually think they're going to risk their revenue stream by taking any meaningful action against account sharing, do you? I've tried asking two different forum moderators (discreetly and politely) for some general (non-specific, as I know how they love to hide behind 'player privacy' to keep us in the dark)…
-
Eliminate the help mechanism altogether. Reduce the champ and quest energy recharge times accordingly, find another way to distribute 7k loyalty per week, and the problem is solved. Is there anybody who enjoys the process of trying to request or give help? Is it an integral part of the game that will cause the MCOC…
-
And Monday is a holiday in Vancouver.
-
Or maybe just get rid of the help mechanism altogether? Reduce the timers to recharge arena champs accordingly and find another way to dole out 7k loyalty per week. Trying to request help is the biggest waste of time in this game, imo.