cityofenoch ★
Reactions
Comments
-
Prior to this latest aq season, I rarely if ever have used the time out method. I actually didn't know about it until legacy showcased it. However, tell me you are doing map 7 now and not using it.
-
furthermore, it's not like we want to use this method. it is incredibly tedious and time consuming. It is being used because unless you run non suicide friendly champs like tigra (who is extremely high skill dependent), sorcerer supreme, or use robots with no suicides, there are very very few options to take apocalypse.…
-
kabam is already aware of this or it wouldn't have been discussed. They literally nerfed this a couple months ago and then got so much backlash they stopped and said they would first investigate why players are using this technique. Well, apparently they didn't learn as they now created a boss that this technique is the…
-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_nHqhqE5b0 about 2:46.
-
You soloed a map 6 boss (different node than map 7) and dismissed his argument. That's not off topic. That is highly relevant. And no, it's not going anywhere. Go and solo map 7 then you have my respect.
-
you dismissed his argument because you soloed it. Two things can be true: yes, my argument was elitist. And yes, you dismissing his argument about aq map being too hard because you soloed it is elitist too. However, as I clarify earlier, you were not comparing apples to apples because your map 6 solo did not have the…
-
oh i see, just have the quote precede my statement.
-
my last post quoted the previous? not following you. So I should quote but NOT quote?
-
the reason it was assumed map 7 is because the cutting wire node, which map 6 and below do not have.
-
i think i have my last few posts? not the earlier ones.
-
also, note the key difference between map 6 and map 7 apocalypse boss nodes (besides overall pi) is the new node cutting wires (this applies a shock damage if running a robot and they are immune to bleed): so in map 6 you run suicides but it doesn't have cutting wires, so you take NO shock damage for that fight. In map 7,…
-
you boast about soloing the boss and … I'm the elitist? perhaps we both are?
-
my bad he doesn't. I guess we all interpret things phenomenologically.
-
I actually kind of like muppet. thanks!
-
I suggest non end game players (anyone doing map6 and under) don't post about soloing a boss that has no relevancy to the initial thread which was always about map 7. also, muppet head is the kind of insult a juvenile makes.
-
100% agreed. Am also in a top 90 alliance (placed 67 last week) and it is a huge cash grab/ resource drain. Kabam 3 months ago: we have no idea why anyone would want to use the corvus method, we're gonna research and come back with better designs. today: kabam designs a boss almost exclusively being taken down using said…
-
well when you are a non advanced poor skilled non end game player, there really isn't much to complain about or understand as you have no experience.
-
I have an r3 g99 and it is almost impossible to one shot on map 7 in a top 90 alliance. I've also finished all content in game including placing 53 in legends run on abyss. Finche is either not a top 500 alliance, or just lying. Most likely lying. If not, post the video and prove it.
-
been looking for a post on this! 100% agree. Kabam designed a boss that almost exclusively requires the corvus technique. Is beyond lame and poorly designed and an insult to the community.
-
congratulations, kabam. I am done with war.
-
Yeah those act 4 and 5 grey ags and ability to max your first chosen r5 were totally rng based.
-
the point was that kabam has sent out a reward almost identical to what they are offering for act 6.4 completion. A lot of people asked if kabam could delay when you select it to better optimize the reward. I don't get why you are upset by people trying to help the community out here? I clarified the error in the full…
-
i clarified that it was a 50% selector. We're being given a 25% selector.
-
I never said they were offering a t5cc selector here.
-
Sorry it was a 50% t5cc selector. Reference seatin’s 2019 gifting event analysis which is available online for all to see. Those rewards were sent in a message to recipients who qualified. Additionally, to become uncollected and cavalier a token was sent in a separate in game message. Just like gifting Rewards were sent in…
-
right. and we are unfortunately having to accept that. My point was to suggest that they have already sent out a full t5cc selector and a partial during gifting. It can be done because it HAS been done. When i said Kabam mike's response was lazy, it's because he completely neglected to mention that slightly critical point…
-
also please note: the game RARELY IF EVER lines up perfectly. We know this! that is the very reason for this discussion stretching into 22 pages. But it has, historically, lined up after fully exploring end game content. See act 4 and act 5 rewards. That is the reason this long discussion exists because of past…
-
CORRECTION: "does little good if you can't use it AFTER* you get the other frags." as well as the other t5cc.
-
Thank you, Doom! Some things are just wasted. My point is this is the TOUGHEST content in the game with entirely new nodes to push the end game player and the community was hoping for the rewards to reflect that, and they have the t5c selector and frag selector they already introduced AND might I add, sent said t5c…
-
they designed an entirely new act to award end game content. Pretty sure to could take the time to make end game rewards.