Diablo rework
Bwest289
Member Posts: 183 ★
Can we get a rework on this guy? He is the absolute worst, and has 0 use.
933 hits as an r3 vs WS.
933 hits as an r3 vs WS.
1
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Agree w magneto.
As well, many (if not all) of the guys listed would be able to take out WS in less hits at r3 than diablo. Especially those that has some kind of synergy available to make them better.
Also, remove BB. I would like a rework but he's not close to top dog on the rework list w the Medusa synergy.
...I'll wait
And to be fair, I am starting to like BB's damage output on his own without Medusa. I recently pulled him as a 6* and he's a decent option for the poison path in AQ Map 5. I run him with Luke and Iceman as an "immunity" team to run either path 1 (bleed) or 8 (poison).
Perhaps you think this is the first time we've had a discussion about how a Champ is useless, shortly after their release. It is not.
I was not trying to argue the OP's findings. However, useless can also be relative to what you're applying them to, hence my point. It takes more than just one or two Fights to get to know a Champ and what they're good for. There's a common mistake made that involves taking them into a WS Fight, and judging their usefulness based on how many Hits it takes to down him. That doesn't factor in much of anything in terms of how to apply their full potential. Some Champs operate differently, and some are much more useful for Defense than Offense. I believe it's worth pointing out that it takes a good amount of time to become familiar with a Champ, and it also requires applying them in a number of different scenarios, not just one Fight. It's worth noting.
By all means, feel free to keep reiterating that I don't have him. I've already established that. Bottom line is, people are too quick to judge, and have a tendency to be overly-critical. If they're not immediately OP, or have mechanics that require amping them up, they're labelled useless. I don't share the same limited point of view. I can say that if I like. I prefer a more thorough approach to exploring Champs.
Perhaps you should just take my words at face value instead of imagining things that aren’t there and taking things too personal. I said we understood your point, but you’re free to ramble on and repeat what both you and I said.