**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options

Wishlist

Please tell me your character wishlist

Comments

  • Options
    Sif
    Taskmaster
    Hela
    Mockingbird
    Anyone agree?
  • Options
    Wubbie075Wubbie075 Posts: 734 ★★★
    The only thing I wish for are more and more threads asking what new characters we want added to the game. We can never have enough of these, so THANK YOU!
  • Options
    No problem
  • Options
    AmonthirAmonthir Posts: 754 ★★★
    The Exterminator, to get rid of the bugs ;)
  • Options
    Lol true that
  • Options
    This isn't even a wishlist it's a joke page now!
  • Options
    But anyone looking for certain characters to be added
  • Options
    FronoxFronox Posts: 4
    What if they made adaptoids playable characters. Their icon would be that universal class maestro and collector have. When you use them in their first fight it's a random character but after that they copy the class specials and abilities of their previous fight. You'll need to awaken them for them to copy signature abilities. The strength of the character correspondsto how leveled up you have him. So if you used your 2/20 adaptoid to fight a 5/50 Gwenpool. During your next fight your adaptoid would have the abilities and speacials of a 2/20 Gwenpool. They don't copy nodes and can't copy Maestro or collector. They also can't be used in AW defense. They could even be a really rare character like Kang and Deadpool. I think this would be awesome. What's yalls thoughts?
  • Options
    That sound great
  • Options
    Hey gang,

    I noticed that @eXtripa69 posted a thread further up in regards to a Character Wishlist thread already available to everyone. We encourage everyone to comment there in regards to which they'd like to see in-game and we appreciate it all being in one place so our game team has an easier time seeing your thoughts.

    With that said, I'm closing this thread due to it being a duplication of another readily available thread.
This discussion has been closed.