Comentarios

  • You are getting 6 star shards for the 5 star max sig. he is recommending the same star level, which is the key difference.
  • It’s the same star level is the difference in this recommendation. In this example you did just dump 6 star shards for 2500. Even at 2500, unless it was a cav crystal, you’re not goin to be particularly pleased as you just dumped 10-15k shards.
  • I think these changes are extremely fair. Here is a quick synopsis: Featured Arena: Same milestones, same effort, now have the ability to compete for a 6 star rank reward. Basic Arena: Same milestones, same effort, now have the ability to compete for a 6 star rank reward and focus all ammo on this arena (6 stars) if you…
  • Only if they change the amount of t3a you can hold. pretty tough when you cant hold enough to rank a character.
  • Can we use all 28 entries in week 4 quest or is it 7 per week fixed?
  • Is the calendar refreshing every 7 days?
  • When this becomes December 21 for a few hours..... then resume worrying about it, I'm pretty sure the community has made the reaction crystal clear. Username Kabam Miike Joined October 2016 Visits 4,025 Last Active December 18 https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/profile/discussions/Kabam%20Miike
  • Corvus or ghost need a buff
  • Kabam --- 'Run this like a mofo, you're good' I run twice, see shards come in second time.... I stop. Me -- banned ______________________________ I somehow can't see this being the case as we would need to egregiously contest our credit card bills. In my opinion, this is way different than last time. Last time there was…
  • So let me recap my understanding Do Limbo Quest -- get key for Hades Invasions and Lost souls (currency) Enter Hades Invasions with key -- get typical side quest rewards Here is what isn't crystal clear.... you can buy ?more? keys with lost souls currency. - Here is the deal: 300 Lost Souls for a Legendary OR Epic Key 150…
  • Yes, I speculated that in the solo event announcement thread after 5 events https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/1429455#Comment_1429455 This why I referenced something “changed” I would like to see kabam dilute the odds of each combat possibility back down to 1/3 of the entire pool of events as…
  • They did leave a caveat on timeline, but here is a refresher from the dev diary: The timelines we have noted are subject to change, though we will strive to hit them. IN THE NEXT 90 DAYS Consistent AI – AI Difficulty in Arenas is all over the place. We’ll be looking to make sure that the AI in Arenas is enjoyable to fight,…
  • I maintain this is not “fixed”. The pool of events now has multiple possible combat events for each class (light ending, medium ending sp1 sp2 etc). This making the odds of class advancement being selected very low. I don’t think anyone wants a 1/7 shot of any class advancement being selected, which is roughly the odds…
  • Moderator commented in the new solo event thread in general.
  • Good look. can you post scoring requirements @Space_goo for it. I believe popping crystals still scores points there.
  • I cant find the post from years ago, but solo events were selected like this: Randomly select 1 event that hasn't occurred in the last 6 selections. Which basically was a 1/12 shot at the eligible events. There are 6 class advancement events. of the 12. Assuming the "last 6" were reset when the event changed and that there…
  • I agree with that. Historically, for the 7 hour event, it was rng with the last 6 events selected ineligible to be the next one. Based on the fact skill and science were chosen in 4 of the first 5 events, I don't think it IS being done the way that we both agree it should be....
  • Crystal opening was never in level up (22 hour) event. As for 7 hour combat it was removed as a way to score points, but they added a "finisher" as another way to score, I do believe crystal opening is still going to be in Class Advancement scoring as Kabam didn't say otherwise, but there hasn't been one since the change.…
  • I'm cavalier. I'm ecstatic with these changes. I'm certainly not expecting game changing stuff for using my heroes. I mean seriously what are you expecting 5 star awakening gems daily for playing the game? Yes I want 3 and 4 star sigs to keep these and new characters maxed for shard purposes. Yes I like keeping a 2 star…
  • We aren’t talking about the season leaderboard. We aren’t talking about the highest scoring alliances. We are talking about the war rating leaderboard, which is what determines tier. We have been masters 4 of last 5 seasons, this is not some random guys that have no idea what we are talking about. There was some sort of…
  • that is correct. this occurred well before that, but I don't deny there could be a relation
  • Nope. it was all war long. We discussed with our opponent (the one the most famous mcoc youtuber was at before leaving his last alliance) and we discussed this in detail. this was a legit bug.
  • no, I am being misunderstood. a limit of x place on war rating leaderboard. As in war 10 there were 45000-48000 alliances and tier 1 ended at 45-48th place. then war 11 all of the sudden there was less than 33000 alliances. then war 12 went back to 45000-48000 This leaderboard:
  • I really dont understand what I am saying that is being interpreted as a correlation between war rating and season points. Could you explain where I am correlating the 2?
  • tier is defined as the top .1 % of war rating (all alliances). tier 1 gets a x8 multiplier. historically (over the past 2 years that I have straddled that rank), that line to tier 2 has fallen between 45th and 48th in war rating rank. war 11 we were 33rd in war rating. this should have been a tier 1 (x8 multiplier) but it…
  • So I would like to follow up my initial post to say that war 12 tier 1 went back to "normal" 45-48 was tier 1. So the war we were 33rd and inexplicably became tier 2 and got tier 2 points cost us masters rewards. We landed as 1st in p1. All competitors around our ranking were not impacted by this bug that happened in war…
  • Possibly, but tier 1 is the top .1% Going from top 45-48, to somewhere under 33 is saying a third of alliances got removed. I’m just asking for it to be looked into... an alliance that was in tier 1.... that won its war jumped spots, should not now be in tier 2 unless something pretty drastic was done.
  • No, in my opinion, this actually will get rid of them all. The shells will be much lower war rating/tier than the owners would want them to be after this season. While the compression will serve the advertised function of getting alliances where they belong on the food chain faster, I am fairly certain this is an intended…
  • Like all rewards in this game they need to keep up with inflation. When these were released they were very relevant. Just like SA was when it was released. Keep their relative relevance current. Getting a 4 star sig or a t1a when this was released it was a big deal. Keep that relativity with the current state of the game.…
  • Ogv vs ogv and warlock vs ogv. Both on flow. 3rd bg is on siphon and we haven’t joined that path yet.