Best Of

I am not an attorney, but I have been studying these legal issues for a very long time. Probably longer than you’ve been playing online games. You’re not going to find very many lawsuits of the type you’re suggesting, and virtually none of them win. The ones you do find where there was a judgment in favor of the plaintiff were decided on completely different technical grounds. The idea that you could sue based on Kabam changing the properties of a champion you purchased is going to fail on several grounds:

1. You do not buy champs. You buy crystals. You buy bundles. You do not buy champs. You don’t own champs. You only purchase the right to use things in the game. Kabam reserves the right to change things, or even delete them completely from the game. Kabam could shut the game down tomorrow and you would have no legal recourse to get your money back.
2. Champs have no monetary value. You’re not allowed to sell or trade them or exchange them in any way for material value. Doing so is against the TOS of the game. As a result, even if you could argue that Kabam changed something you “bought” you couldn’t assert monetary damages. The TOS forbids you from doing so.
3. You can’t argue that the TOS is invalid or you do not accept its terms. If you choose not to accept the terms set forth in the TOS, you are required to stop playing the game. Playing the game while deliberately refusing to accept the TOS means you are playing the game without permission. This would be an admission of theft of service. This is not a winning strategy in a court of law.

In the US especially, you can sue over anything, and anything is possible. However, any good attorney would advise you the odds of winning such a case is vanishingly small, most people who have tried have not gotten past dismissal with prejudice or summary judgment, and no one has yet won based on the premise of false advertising or material loss due to a game balance change. Not in the western world, anyway.

But don’t take my word for it. Speak to an actual attorney. Find one willing to take your case that doesn’t ask for a huge retainer in advance.

Nico is one of the 3/5 defender who needs the nerfed "on Defense".

Go ahead press your dislikes. I called out the same for all of these 3/5 defenders.

Why would they allow something that locks players out of certain game modes be sent around?

I get the theme. But this is in poor taste. No wonder some assume it's a hack to their accounts or that it might cause their accounts to get banned with all that's transpired over the past few months. Bad taste! Childish even.

@KabamPinwheel @Kabam (Osaurus) Rex any comments on this? Why was she marketed as a potential Bullseye counter only for y’all to take it away?

Gut feeling is to sunset this version and relaunch and rebrand Mcoc 2.0 when the MCU reboots.

It's a massive change to a good piece of utility.

Her matchup spread thins out significantly with the removal of the ensnare, you could use her for even bullseye or fighting against herself.

I didn't get this gift. When did you get this one? What's in that claim?

Serpent existing should also be removed.

Cause screw you thats why. You are awful. You make GW seem like a a kabam hater. You lick boots so hard your tongue has tread marks.

New term : KabamCuck