Best Of

The 8 stacks that IMIW received below 15% health all triggered simultaneously. So yes, they will all go down together simultaneously.

That's insightful but with same logic Korg's 3 crowd cheers should go down together right which he gets simultaneously for parry. Thanks for info

there are multiple mechanics based around stacks
1) Items stacks but come off one at a time, even if applied at the same time. This is rare but does happen, but it will generally tell you if this is the case.
2) items stack but come off based on when they are applied. This is the norm, all the timers run at the exact same time as each other. If they are all placed at the same time they are all removed at the same time.

Korgs ability works just like IMIW, all charges have their own timers that count down simultaneously, if you get 3 charges at one time all 3 will end at the exact same time. If you get 3 and then another 3, they will end in groups of 3.

I can say it other way then, but it's correct. Also other similar scenarios in the game work just like this one, and have been confirmed as intended as well.

You have an incinerate ability that deals 100% damage. Add 40% from the node, and you get 140% damage.
If your champion is 100% resistent to it, then there is still 40% damage left. You need a champion, or someone who is able to be 140% resistent to it

Once again, that’s not how math works. It should work like this;

Incinerate ability does 100 damage. Enhanced incineration increases it to 140 damage. 100% incineration resistance means you prevent ALL 140 of the damage.

That is not how math works. If you have x apples and they give you 100% more apples you have 2x apples. If they then take away 100% apples there is now x apples. You can write the equation as x + x - x=x.


What you are trying to do is reassign x in the middle of the equation so that 100% is the final result of the addition before you do the subtraction, x+x -(x+x) =0. That requires additional wording not in the system.

Actually, if they take away 100% of your apples you don’t have any apples anymore.

That’s how 100% works.

Dr. Zola

When you say "100% of MY apples", you are redefining the representation of 100% from X to me and what I have, that is not how it works unless you define a re declaration, which they didnt, because we already declared 100% to represent X which just happens to be the apples I had at the start. 100% is not a continuously updating value unless you declare it so.

“100% apples” and 100% are two entirely different things.

You are changing a percentage, which is a relative value, to a specific, declared value (X or X apples). Fine if you want to do that, but it’s no longer a percentage.

Dr. Zola