Best Of
Re: A wave of blockages
A little bit of introspection may help your friends. So far it seems those in this ban wave are players that either allowed/paid others to play their accounts, or were paid by others to play their accounts. At least those that have been responded to on the forums have been outed and told to "play their own account".
Re: any update on this?
my alliance doesn't do off season wars
Missing 1,000 7 star shards isn’t the end of the world worst case scenario
Re: Kabam, why aren't they banned? The situation with CIS region streamers accept money to complete cont
Nah not all, just the banned ones.it doesn't mean anything. and I don't want people to think the same way about the RU community. We have a lot of good players, but at the moment, only 2-3 people from the RU segment are active on this form, and since we're in the minority, some people might still think that all Russians are like this.I see a lot you read some comments here from some members of the RUS community and you get a cringe from the fact that they can't behave appropriately. it's one thing to get banned, but it's another to have good communication skills. and then it will seem like the entire Russian community is inept because of themof Russians in this topic.There where many posts full of insults or trolling from people from different countries, does it means that whole community from their countries are like that?
Re: Kabam, why aren't they banned? The situation with CIS region streamers accept money to complete cont
Google translate is really convinced that you're talking about violins, and that's the comedic relief we needed for a situation that is already fairly enjoyable.Keep respect for each other! I'm not asking for your assessment of whether it's fair or not. This violates the rules of using the game. It's not a fair game if people pay money to streamers to complete tasks on other people's accounts.О каком уважении может идти речь если проходчики почему-то в твоих глазах главное зло игры, не обращая внимание на читеров или хотя-бы скрипачей которые занимают топ 1 на арене

10
Re: Kabam, why aren't they banned? The situation with CIS region streamers accept money to complete cont
RomVite was banned the other day. He was crying on forums the other day. I wouldn’t worry about it too much

1
Re: Apocalypse Signature ability rework
Warlock helps in defense at leastApoc sig ability is practically nothing ... I don't know if there is more useless sigWarlock

1
Re: Kabam, why aren't they banned? The situation with CIS region streamers accept money to complete cont
a large number of players have transferred their game account to their teammates to help on aq and if all players are blocked for account transfer then kabam will lose more than 50% of players. on account transfer for passing content for money you are right such accounts should be blockedKabam isn't going to lose anything or anyone banning players that cheat or take money from others to play for them.
Re: CCP-1 5 star spider-man
I won't mind if they include 5* starky in an objetive.
These challanges are not for noobs anyway.
It wont hurt a single player if they include a 5* in a permanent paragon+ objetive.
I have my fair share of struggle, pulling champs specifically for carianas challanges, not one but in both accounts. I get the frustrations. It's not much of a ask really.
The challanges are old and 5*s are not even relevant, outside these challanges.
These challanges are not for noobs anyway.
It wont hurt a single player if they include a 5* in a permanent paragon+ objetive.
I have my fair share of struggle, pulling champs specifically for carianas challanges, not one but in both accounts. I get the frustrations. It's not much of a ask really.
The challanges are old and 5*s are not even relevant, outside these challanges.
Re: CCP-1 5 star spider-man
I won't mind if they include 5* starky in an objetive.Yes, I agree with this. I think they've done a good job of providing the necessary champs for those challenges when they have required 3 and 4*s. I don't really see a problem with providing 5*s as well.
These challanges are not for noobs anyway.
It wont hurt a single player if they include a 5* in a permanent paragon+ objetive.
I have my fair share of struggle, pulling champs specifically for carianas challanges, not one but in both accounts. I get the frustrations. It's not much of a ask really.
The challanges are old and 5*s are not even relevant, outside these challanges.

2
Re: Sabretooth buff
Kabam has data for what happens adding +1 to his persistent charge with the SP3. It's already in the game as the Sasquatch synergy, so what more would they need to test? They know it's not game breaking, because it's already in the game.If they changed his persistent mechanic to something that just built up consistently they would have to specifically test it at all levels of ramp, how hard it is to achieve compared to how strong it is etc. For the buff we got they had to test how much his over cap furies helped him and not much else. Dll explicitly said that they weren't going to add me mechanics or rework anything in a huge way because they didn't have time for that. Voodoos new sp2 is about as extensive as they could get and that wasn't even that big of a changeMore testing than everyone already exclusively using him with Sasquatch? I mean outside of testing to make sure they didn't screw it up. They would need to change the Sasquatch synergy, but how hard would that be by comparison?I feel like they spent too much of the limited update time dinking around with his Furies, didn't address his charge mechanic at all, and at the last second, added that bogus regen just to say they did some regen stuff. It still sucks. They cut the crusts off a 💩 sandwich and then put cheese on it. If the time was limited, they should have picked easier champs and/or lifted more existing stuff from other champs instead of adding all new stuff.Changing the persistent charge mechanic would have required way more time testing that they didn't have
Maybe they were going for a Weapon X theme thing, like OG Deadpool is straight regen, X-pool is straight damage, Wolverine is regen with a little bleed, Sabretooth is damage with a little speck of regen? That's fine, but why does his regen have to be worse than Bishop's and who's going to use him without Sasquatch?
If they didn't really have time to do it, they either shouldn't have, or they should have devoted more resources to it. Why don't they reuse more known good assets/mechanics to shave some time and effort off these projects? From the outside, it looks like Kabam MO is to create a Rube Goldberg machine to facilitate skipping over low hanging fruit.