Best Of
Game balance hypocrisy
The change to Spiderwoman under the guise of being beneficial to us is a very hypocritical and unnecessary change.
Kabam has created a very difficult challenge for themselves, which they are not handling well.
Any change Kabam makes to any champion for any reason now has to go through the filter of Bullseye, Enchantress, Serpent, and Dark Phoenix. Since those champions are allowed to exist as they are, Kabam needs to have a DAMN good reason for changing any other champ in a negative way.
Kabam, you have created minibosses wrapped up in a champion skin and let them run loose and wreck people's enjoyment of this game for way too long. Any change that even slightly nerf or tunes down a champion's ability that isn't one of those 4 will immediately be met with scrutiny and negative backlash, and you have to know this.
#JusticeForSpiderWoman
I now open the floor to cheesemaster to make an unnecessary personal attack on me.
Re: Spiderwoman's AAR is too "confusing" .... but the Pacify mastery has existed for years
Kabam should just be honest.
“We are doing thing because we want to… because we can. Too bad losers; cry more. Don’t forget the next sale. See you then, lol”
Until the last two sentences aren’t true for the whales, just expect more disconnected nonsense. This game is being run by bean counters. it’s a shame they waste energy trying to gaslight us with fake logic and gaming buzzwords (balance, economy, etc)… seems like the bean counters could save some money if they avoided that too.
Re: Spiderwoman's AAR is too "confusing" .... but the Pacify mastery has existed for years
Sure, but if you're using "think of the new player" and "timers" for arguments, why are Arc Overload nodes and most other node interactions acceptable?
And, per your logic, Karolina's swapping sunlight would also throw off new players yet Kabam is fine releasing complicated champions in general.
Re: Spider-woman balance update
I wouldn't even see this as an issue if they would just be honest that they want to tune her down offensively. Instead they try to perform mental gymnastics as to why this isn't hurting her offensively, when it CLEARLY is. That's what I'm frustrated about. Why can't they just be honest? Or are the balance team truly so out of touch with the game that they don't get how an evade shutdown ability is offensively huge? Either way is not good.
Re: Spider-woman balance update
Sincerely: the dumbass who looks at red and yellow numbers and ignores the rest of the kit
Re: Game balance hypocrisy
As is the case 9/10 times with Kabam drama, the biggest issue is with communication / delivery. They write a paragraph explaining how great she is offensively but that they won't be changing her offensively. Then in the next paragraph they say they are removing an effect that I would say is 50/50 offensive and defensive and try to convince us that it won't effect her offensively.
I would have no problem if they just said, she's a 10/10 offensively so we feel comfortable nerfing one tiny offensive aspect to make her a 9.5/10 offensively. Them trying to convince us it will have no effect is far more frustrating than just saying they are nerfing her a tiny bit.
And all that is on top of them (for some unexplainable reason) just gaslighting us into thinking they can't remove it on defense only. I seriously don't even mind the actual change they plan to make. JUST BE STRAIGHT FOWARD AND HONEST WITH YOUR COMMUNICATION!!!
Re: Spider-woman balance update
I’m really starting to wonder who’s making all these terrible decisions this year what the hell happened to the 2023-2024 design team… anyways yeah this change does absolutely nothing on defense and only makes her worse on attack, the usual counters like Cull Bullseye Okoye and Red Guardian still nuke her and anything that doesn’t straight up shut down that evade or have tranquilize either times out or takes a f**k ton of damage. The fumble still puts her way above that 3.5/5 if they truly wanted to lower her defensive potential then that’s what should’ve been removed not the ensnare, now there’s a decent chunk of matchups she can no longer do on attacks because of this bs.
To anyone who pulled Karolina, get ready to see that glancing be nerfed to the ground too, don’t r4 until the announcement is made.
Re: Why remove the ensnare and not the fumble debuff?
For the first time in my life I actually agree with this guy lol this change does absolutely nothing on defense and only makes her worse on attack, the usual counters like Cull Bullseye Okoye and Red Guardian still nuke her and anything that doesn’t straight up shut down that evade or have tranquilize either times out or takes a **** ton of damage. The fumble still puts her way above that 3.5/5 if they truly wanted to lower her defensive potential then that’s what should’ve been removed not the ensnare, now there’s a decent chunk of matchups she can no longer do
Why remove the ensnare and not the fumble debuff?

Ensnare was annoying but cutting It from defensive stand would be enough
But the fumble debuff that the solo purpose is SHUTTING DOWN DEXTERITY is not even mentioned or touched during the update discription, you guys made a debuff solely to shut down a mastery made to avoid attacks and making us take all the hits from S1 in the block but the Anti Evade is the issue
The ability accuracy reduction i would understand but how is the fumble not a problem?