Best Of
Re: Thoughts on ascension pool “buffs”
I actually quite like the pool. It's a lot of champions that I kind of like but that aren't, at the same time, on my rank-up radar. Having them on a different track that doesn't "steal resources" from the champs that I do want to rank up normally feels very nice.
Then there are a few champs there that I do have ranked up, such as Howard the Duck, Adam Warlock and Baron Zemo. I'm very, very excited about being able to ascend them.
And then there are the buff, that I for the most part think looks fine. I immediately rank 4'd Jabari Panther after seeing her buff details, I think it looks amazing. It addresses a lot of my complaints about the champion and I'm very excited to see her in action. Then there are some champions that I'm really excited to see buffed, such as Korg and Sam Wilson, but will need to test myself to evaluate. Finally there are some champs that are more "eh, they're not my jam but the buff looks good" - your iDooms and Emma Frosts. I don't think their buffs look bad by any means - based on conversations I've had with fans of theirs, they seem to address some pain points just like the Jabari buff does for me - but they probably still won't end up in my deck. Just personal preference rather than any lack of quality.
All in all, everything looks pretty solid in my eyes. I can't wait until all of this kicks off next (right?) month.
Re: Thoughts on ascension pool “buffs”
They seem underwhelming and the sad part is some people appear to be so used to buffs being ass lately that they're setting the bar extremely low and calling them decent. Some of these buffs have potential but there isn't a single one that makes you go "wow that one's gonna be meta for sure". All they've done for most of the champs is increase damage and ramp up time, however, what I barely see in every buff is utility, what even is the point in increasing the damage if the pool of champs they can take is still limited? I know some of them got a few bits and pieces of utility but in my opinion it's just not enough regardless.
They're not as terrible and useless as Sabretooth's buff I'll give them that, but on paper they don't sound anything like the goated buffs we used to have a year or two ago with the likes of Sinister and Red Guardian who to this day are still extremely meta relevant.
There are times where I wonder if it's worth playing the game
Re: How Can i Report someone for global chat harassment
Only you can stop yourself from being a whiney snowflake.
Re: Character Wishlist Thread 3.0
Techno
Ghost Rider (Thunderbolts)
Red Leader
Jolt
Citizen V (Helmut Zemo)
Meteorite
Agent Venom (Thunderbolts)
Mach-2 (Abner Jenkins)
Re: How Can i Report someone for global chat harassment
what exactly did he say that was bad? It seems to me that you are just overly sensitive.
Re: Kabam...... It's time you admit it...
I think a tuned up centurion would be sick honestly. He doesn't need much to be a super relevant attacker
Re: Kabam & their nonsense
If your issues with the ai are that destroyer spams a lot of sp1s or hides when you want him to attack, it's not noticeably different behavior than any of the other defenders in my experience. If you're using deathless she-hulk, you don't care about falter timers or sp1 spams as long as you get your heavies and sp2s in. Between quicksilver, Photon, onslaught, cap Britain, even prowler you can mitigate the falter or power gain and work around sp2s. I used silk to reliably keep him to sp2s just with patience and timing. If you slip up it's instant sp3, so in that case it's more unforgiving than the others, but personally destroyer was less time consuming than xbones, just by fact of a much easier dex of sp2s.
That's been my experience , anyways.
Re: Kabam & their nonsense
i did all the runs for pts on destroyer, didn't notice anything unusual, sometimes he was a bit passive, but thats about it, can you perhaps record a video pointing out the issue?












