Best Of

yeah I honestly feel bad for him having to be the messenger

Consistent with their recent messaging that we should exploit bugs as early and often as we can.

anndddd more kabam inconsistency
one 7* key = ❌
1:1 return of all 7* crystals you opened because you opened them when they were bugged = ✅
is it really that hard to just apply the same level of logic to everything instead of ahh we’re too small a company to do anything about it but just this time!

Holy **** you are absolutely right. How insanely ridiculous that they wrote those two things in the same message and saw no issue.

Reenabling the code a second time would be the perfect solution. The people who already claimed it wouldn't be able to again, and those who missed out would be made even with the others. Seriously, why WOULDN'T they do this other than wanting more people to not have exclusive champs they can gatekeep for over a year (OG she hulk from last year's box still not in the basic btw).

You guys messed up, make it fair even if it hurts your pockets a tiny bit in the long run.

nobody isnt being happy for the people who got the key; the main issue is they arent being fair and giving those who didn't a chance at the key all the anger is towards kabam.

it's just wrong on so many levels and they always come up with lame excuses.
it used to be all about " the fairness / integrity " of the game. now they are zigging and zagging and use what ever excuse they can think off to justify their mistakes.
now it's all being swept under…there are so many issues so no priority to correct this lol

atleast provide full transparency and tell how many persons actually got to use the faulty code.

The irony is that it would have taken them longer to correct and remove the code than do nothing and leave a message on the forum saying that they know about the bug and have left it intentionally open. They chose to correct it and now being asked to give compensation.

Hardly seems like a time issue...its counterproductive and wouldnt have been game breaking to leave it open

makes totally sense…this has no priority but a person who didn't use it on time was??
lol this is such a joke and lame excuse.

"Sheer volume of priorities " ⇒ perhaps that is the issue? You guys are trying to crank out so much content, that the quality of them has gone down the drain.

Just look at the dimensional arcade and poker event, Mike. If this was kabam miike he'd be at least trying to pass on the feedback instead of letting the "quantity over quality " continue to slide

I'm surprised i haven't seen anyone jump all over this specific point: that one particular code was created without a limit, and that somehow that code "got out somehow." The potential optic of an employee creating a code outside of the boundaries of the assignment and then accidentally (?) sharing it with the wrong audience is not a good optic at all. A test code that somehow got out to production? A template code meant to be tweaked individually, then released? I'm running out of hoops to jump through to explain this.