Best Of
Re: Can we please have this new aq and aq raids permanently? Instead of old aq.
People think new means better rewards. This new AQ is more of a QoL change, rewards are similar to map 8; the main difference maybe is that you are 100% tied to alliance prestige for the ranking since EVERYONE is doing the same difficulty.
And the rewards are higher...so more work for better rewards as opposed to less work for similar rewards.
Re: The New Ascension Seems Like One of the Worst Additions to the Game
F2P players keep the game alive brah. Saying "F2P contribute nothing" is objectively wrong. Do you really think the whales would still drop hundreds of thousands of dollars if the game only had 3k active players? Investors love big player counts; guess who makes up that majority 😜
What's the point of keeping the lights on if nobody is home?
Kabam intentionally nerfed jabari

Kabam have ruined jabari panther
I already thought this buff was bad
but its worse than I thought
80% precision to 25%
what
kabam john said in the stream that they slightly reduced the precision
so he flat out lied
also dll flat out lied in his video
he said the hunt bleeds have been reduced bc u will have more bleeds on the opponent...
what
HOW WILL U HAVE MORE BLEEDS
there is nothing helping u have more bleeds, u will have less bc u wont crit as much
also in the post where they say jabari was buffed, they say she will undoubtely will have higher damage but she just wont
her numbers are worse, her damage is worse
'well u'll get the fury easier' ITS SO EASY TO GET THE FURY
just spam sp1 to ramp and get charges
i dont think ive ever been more infuriated at a decision
i love playing jabari, her damage is insane and now it wont be
yes u will sometimes miss out on the fury but ull get it most of the time
also the cruelty against science is rly stupid to me bc it only helps against photon and thing, the only bleed immune science defenders
kabam, if ur reading this, which u probably r, please dont do this, i **** beg of u
or at least admit u wanted to **** nerf her instead of pretending this is a buff
if players see this, please interact to try and get their attention, bc kabam is either genuinely stupid and think this will actually help jabari or theyre blatantly lying
ik most ppl dont play jabari, but for the few people who do, this is just disgraceful
idk what else to say, ik ive been a bit much in my language and maybe been too mean, but it genuinely annoys me sm that kabam have done this and try to **** gaslight me
anyways, yeah this is the end of the post, kabam honestly might delete this, idk
Re: Cannot scroll left and right on items crystal opening
Same issue for me. This game mode is not playable now.
Re: Average cost to acquire 7 stars first appearance
yes, its a guaranteed chance of 1 in 120. so you need to spend 36k to get a guaranteed first appearance new 7*. in USD thats on average $1200.
if you want to dupe the champion, thats another $1200, and if u want another dupe for ascension materials.. thats another $1200.
So I hope you saved up $3600 to get that one champion first appearance and ascended.
Re: 7* Ascension
Wasn’t a terrible concept until they pulled the “new champs are locked behind cash” basically. I mean don’t get me wrong the fact that some trash like Patriot were in it was horrible, but at least we had some gems in it like BPCW and some decent ones like Gentle. However locking new champs completely is just such a **** predatory greedy move from Kabam I really don’t understand what they were thinking.
Why is nobody talking about these changes in Battlegrounds?

Let's see if I understood correctly:
You want me to have 40 champions in my deck.
If I place a defender that isn't from the saga, it will die on its own in 20 seconds.
As if my defender dying on its own wasn't enough, if my opponent loses 50% of their health but fights faster, they win.
With new champion ascensions restricted to Valiant Crystal, whales will have infinite ascensions while I'll have to wait a year.
And there's more: Now you can reroll 3 times. And it's paid. This shouldn't even exist, but since it does, it should be free.
Let's get to the practical summary:
My opponent's champions will have more health, more attack, my non-saga defenders die on their own, I have the perfect fight, I come out with 100% health, I face a 7-second loading screen, and my opponent has a terrible fight, loses half their health, and wins the match because their attacker has more attack, their defender has more health, and their phone is better than mine. Skill Issue, obviously.
And I spend money in the game, right? I already have resources for my first 7-Star Rank 5 and I have about 46 7-Star Rank 4 champions. If I were to build a deck only with Saga champions, more than half of my 7-Star Rank 4 champions would be left out. Imagine those who are free-to-play.
This is unbelievable. There is no reason for these "tests" to happen.
It doesn't matter if it happens in the off-season, if it's for a season, the answer is no, this is not healthy, this is completely destroying the competitive aspect of the game. The mere fact that you're even considering testing this already indicates the extremely worrying direction the game is heading.
Want ideas to change in Battlegrounds? Here are a few:
Matches should start at exactly the same time. No one should have a loading disadvantage.
You increased the deck size, but you still get 5 champions for two picks and three champions for one pick. This should have increased proportionally to the deck size.
Remove Reroll or make it free.
Start banning cheaters more frequently.
Look at the Battlegrounds alliance rewards. There were alliances focused on Battlegrounds just to collect them.
5 bans allow you to ban almost an entire class from a small account. This is unhealthy.
You have things to do. Stop having ideas and maintain things. We don't need defenders dying alone or matches being decided by who fought the fight the fastest, not who fought the best fight. Keep competitive modes away from these strange ideas. Go back to focusing on cosmetics.
BattleGrounds mismatched
