Best Of
Re: Event quest rewards/difficulty
No idea what the pics are supposed to tell us, but the rewards:effort ratio is bad for all players of every progression right now
Re: 7* VALKYRIE NERFED?
@Kabam (Osaurus) Rex To be honest he could have a point about Corvus. He has a permanent True Damage buff, which ignores armor.
Based on what you explained is causing the damage reduction, it could be messing with True Damage too. Can you please confirmed Corvus performance wasn't impacted? Thanks
Re: Yelena bug against Void Coliseum?
Yeah I'm wrong on this one
If you are at 9 combo hits, the debuff activates, you just need 1 more hit to purify the debuff
I misread the ability description for void
Re: What is it?
Hi @willrun4adonut ,
To be honest with what Kabam have done now, introducing exchange limits, it might be a blessing in disguise that you didn't loaded up more. 🤣
Hi @BringPopcorn ,
I try to compensate my own lack skill (and with age it onlg going to get worst) with resources management 🤣.
So I'm also very obsessed with resources, stack, and currently management too.
Always get a smile of my face if I could get Glory within a couple of token below the limit 🤣.
It is annoy me that is it not equal 🤣.
For me with everything I said in my previous post, it is because I do want Kabam and MCOC to do well, and it is shame that these little things cna be much easier managed the resolve, but Kabam just keep chalking them up and killing the positive vibe.
As for me I didn't went crazy with the 10 units offer since I guesstimate I wouldn't need that many through out the year, still get 5 x R1 - R2 gems, so it doesn't impact me much.
But I feel for @Vladok2603
Re: What is it?
Do agreed with you, and yep, we both can understand why Kabam might implement limit exchange.
However, players also make informed decisions based on the current state of the game and what it enable players to do.
By changing something like this mid-way it give the players "feel" of being "rug pulled".
We have had a very poor end of the 2025 with players sentiment, communication and trust in Kabam, the Banquet was amazing with so many positive and pro players action, communication improved and we are in a good momentum going forward into 2026 with a fresh start.
It such a simple thing like this but bad handle will just be anoher sour marker for 2026 and how many of them before the positive community sentiment go down the drain again.
Something like this should have worked out in these step:-
Situation 1) Kabam awared of the Trade In Exchange being available and how players may utilise this in combination with the 10 units offer. So Kabam implement the exchange limits BEFORE releasing the 10 Units offer.
Situation 2) Kabam only aware of the situation mid-way into the 10 unit offer and after reevaluating the game balance feel that they need to implement exchange limit. Then they should follow with these other step
- Create a shot post informing the community that Kabam is implementing a limit on catalysts exchange in the Trade In store (they don't even need to talk about the concern regarding it being use to limited expiring catalysts, those that know will know). This would limited the amount of those affected, as most players would have brought extra need the end of the offer.
- For those that affect they could submit a ticket for those purchases to be undo by Kabam
That would have been the way to have clear communication and build trust.
Instead Kabam go back to doing thing like before, noticed somethjng too late make changes that effect players and stay quiet about it.
It is 2026, we are now in our 12 years of the game, let not have the cycle repeat itself.
Re: What is it?
Ehh I guess, I am pretty obsessive about stack management. I understand Banquet was RNG and you couldn't control it; but I always made sure with traders outpost but
Ys, glory, radiance and everything else to keep my stashes pretty equal in quantity.



