Best Of
Re: Need Advice: 7* Cosmic Awakening Gem
Serpent 🤡, he is BS defender also a fun attacker, definitely go for him
Osborne
Re: do you like the bgs changes?
Absolutely terrible. Lets just ban 5 mystics and run all the toxic cosmic defenders. While were at it, let's make all the progression of anyone that wasnt a whale during Banquet all for nothing.
Polygon
Re: Dimensional Arcade
I am hoping for a no date, event concludes and they just send the rewards cause they couldn't fix it. That would save a lot of time.
Re: do you like the bgs changes?
Just rename the mode “Roster Grounds” - do the draft, everyone knows the outcome at the end of that. Award the winner and save us the fight time
Re: New BG requirements make it harder for FTP.
Please show me one, one comment from any player in any media (forums reddit Facebook global chat yt comments) where they said "guys it would be nice eto have 40 deck size or 5 bans or 3 REROLLS" PRIOR to this update, and I'll quit.
Literally the one thing nobody ask for, and let's do it. Kabam now act like those evil scientists in ww2 who did evil experiments on prisoners to check their tolerance level, and here we are the prisoners.
Lunar event 136K points 🥴
KillerM
Re: Solo Coliseum Crossbones
suggestions for kabam:
- Remove bane,
- Allow dexing or blocking of CB’s SP2,
- Remove that “power meter gain lock”,
- Allow more counters,
- Other suggestions?
This crossbones’ fight is unreasonable beyond words.
Valroz
New BG requirements make it harder for FTP.
I love BGs, but the new 40 champ deck requirement and 5 ban is actually a negative for my account and for most casual/non-spending players i think.
I grinded 90% of the game, and still struggle to even touch the roster power of the TOP players.
Currently i have:
7* R4 - 6
7* R3 - 11
7* R2 - 11
6* R5^A - 8
6* R5 - 6
so a total of 42 usable champs, but to be honest, if we disregard the R2 7* and non-ascended 6*, its more like 25 usable champs in BG.
With this roster when it was even weaker i reached gladiator in january 2026 and december 2025. I usually just prayed my opponent was bad at the game and also tried to play as cleanly as I could to outscore them, while placing lower ranked defenders and using lower ranked attackers, and it worked.
However, think about it, now , my R4s will get banned, i will be left choosing R2 7* ??? as defenders and attackers? and they will get lucky reshuffling 3 times in the match? i dont like spending my battle trophees on shuffling signets, id rather buy resources to rank more of my champs, i dont buy cash offers, everything i get is through the playing of the game.
So:
1. this firstly makes it more expensive to shuffle my champs if i wanna have the same advantage. (when it was 1 shuffle, i could take it or leave it, might use it in vibranium brackets)
2. My TOP champions will get banned and there is nothing i can do about it (it used to be only 50% of them).
3. I have to use much lower ranked champions because I don't want to spend $1000/month on a game. Therefore R2 defenders have no way to win, and with attackers i have to be 2x more aggressive , i dont know man.
I was so happy after last season thinking, hey, i only need to rank up 5 more champs, and ill have at least an R3+ power roster to compete now. But no, i have to rank up 15 champs now.
I hope this "experiment" remains an experiment and we can forget about it after. I get it why they want to implement it (players use the same champs all the time, also too many annoying defenders). But guess what, players will still use the same champs all the time, so this only gives advantage to those players who have like 50 7* at R4. and They will ban 5/6 of my 7* R4, and then, im left using my R2s..or spend more currencies to reshuffle.
like..... what? is this fair from a POV covering the entire game community? or is it just fair for the TOP 0.01% of players?
lucianxvs
