Best Of
Re: We really need to start talking about Nico Minoru
Meh , I know that you're whining. I just don't care to humour that.
Ascended Borders Look Worse
The new Ascended character borders look far less ‘special’ compared to the old purple gradients. Honestly, the purple gradient was already good enough; clean, sharp, and fitting. Instead, they replaced it with this strange pink tone that looks completely awful. It completely ruins the visual appeal, and right now it looks terrible. Maybe if they had wanted to emphasize the Ascended status, they could have kept the same texture style as the purple gradient but used a fiery amber orange. That would have looked unique, powerful, and fitting for something meant to stand out. Instead, the current design looks cheap and out of place.
Re: We need to do something about Battlegrounds
The incentive to rush and push is low. I don't camp, i am just not interested.
I only do the 3 wins every 48 hrs and then push on the last week. Tell them to give those P2W people better rewards and they might stop camping; but that is not gonna help you at all either rofl.
Re: We need to do something about Battlegrounds
they arent camping. The overall participation is so low its a challenge for them to get through the vt
Ragnarok13
11
My overall complaint about Battlegrounds
I really did everything I could to not have to post this, but...
So anyway, I've done BGs for a while now, since this is the closest thing to actually doing PvP in game. And even though I stink at this (can never get higher than Uru I), The strategy involved is what I appreciate about this.
This being said... I never really liked the shuffle part of this game. It didn't give you the ability to get the champ that you really want. But because I've drafted before in CCGs, I understand what making hard choices means. I was okay with only having 13 shuffle signets and only being able to buy 5 a day. It made the game a little more strategic. Making your choices even more important. And I was cool with it.
BUT THEN!! You just HAD to expand the roster from 30 to 40!! I get the fact that you want people to make sure that they get more of their champs into the game (I thought that this format was all about making the hard choices, but whatever...). But this?? This right here?? This lowers the probability of seeing the champ that you want especially at the time you need it. I think that you saw this possibility and tried to work around it by adding more shuffle signets from 1 to 3 (one per each draft pull).
BUT YOU DIDN'T FIX THE ECONOMY FOR SHUFFLE SIGNETS!! If you change the number of shuffles per match from 1 to 3, but the max holding is still 13, and the amount of signet purchases is still 5 a day, you were going to run out very quickly!! Especially now that you increased the deck from 30 to 40 and have decreased optimum probability and increased the need for shuffle signets.
And just when I thought it couldn't get worse? I was figuring out how I was going to make 5 shuffle signets a day work, and you change the purchase to essentia and allow for 35 a week (which technically is 5 a day, but because you still can only hold 13 in inventory, you cause a stash issue...), but you compound on that by changing this in the middle of the week and me with not being able to buy any signets!! I went from buying 5 signets on Monday to it going to 0/35 signets the next day and having to wait for next Monday to buy anymore!! I've been doing BGs for this week on no signets left and taking whatever the game gives me!! It hurts especially when it looks like the game gives my opponent everything he needs, and me the wrong champ at the wrong time.
I'm not going to sit here typing about the essentia economy. I think everyone here is already complaining about that. I think that you guys need to have a serious look at shuffle signets, and the need to limit them. I don't think that you should have a limit, and DEFINITELY NOT THIRTEEN!! Because the change in the system has changed the supply/demand system, you absolutely have to increase the supply to satisfy the increased demand.
You could say that I'm silly, but the fact that you have actually seen this and tried to address it (however horrible that you tried) lets me know that I'm not that far off-base.
Please help this matter Kabam...
So anyway, I've done BGs for a while now, since this is the closest thing to actually doing PvP in game. And even though I stink at this (can never get higher than Uru I), The strategy involved is what I appreciate about this.
This being said... I never really liked the shuffle part of this game. It didn't give you the ability to get the champ that you really want. But because I've drafted before in CCGs, I understand what making hard choices means. I was okay with only having 13 shuffle signets and only being able to buy 5 a day. It made the game a little more strategic. Making your choices even more important. And I was cool with it.
BUT THEN!! You just HAD to expand the roster from 30 to 40!! I get the fact that you want people to make sure that they get more of their champs into the game (I thought that this format was all about making the hard choices, but whatever...). But this?? This right here?? This lowers the probability of seeing the champ that you want especially at the time you need it. I think that you saw this possibility and tried to work around it by adding more shuffle signets from 1 to 3 (one per each draft pull).
BUT YOU DIDN'T FIX THE ECONOMY FOR SHUFFLE SIGNETS!! If you change the number of shuffles per match from 1 to 3, but the max holding is still 13, and the amount of signet purchases is still 5 a day, you were going to run out very quickly!! Especially now that you increased the deck from 30 to 40 and have decreased optimum probability and increased the need for shuffle signets.
And just when I thought it couldn't get worse? I was figuring out how I was going to make 5 shuffle signets a day work, and you change the purchase to essentia and allow for 35 a week (which technically is 5 a day, but because you still can only hold 13 in inventory, you cause a stash issue...), but you compound on that by changing this in the middle of the week and me with not being able to buy any signets!! I went from buying 5 signets on Monday to it going to 0/35 signets the next day and having to wait for next Monday to buy anymore!! I've been doing BGs for this week on no signets left and taking whatever the game gives me!! It hurts especially when it looks like the game gives my opponent everything he needs, and me the wrong champ at the wrong time.
I'm not going to sit here typing about the essentia economy. I think everyone here is already complaining about that. I think that you guys need to have a serious look at shuffle signets, and the need to limit them. I don't think that you should have a limit, and DEFINITELY NOT THIRTEEN!! Because the change in the system has changed the supply/demand system, you absolutely have to increase the supply to satisfy the increased demand.
You could say that I'm silly, but the fact that you have actually seen this and tried to address it (however horrible that you tried) lets me know that I'm not that far off-base.
Please help this matter Kabam...
Re: Let's have a genuine, honest conversation Kabam
if kabam (the corporation) can get their **** together then yes I genuinely do. But if they keep playing games then I dont see it going for as long as they want it to
ahmynuts
5
Re: Seriously can't understand what Kabam is doing. High time to quit!
Valid asf crash out. They literally just let the error stay in the game. ZERO care to fix it. Justified anger.
Essentia
Have they told us how much Essentia we will be earning in the game. Like how much Essentia will each level of BG get, or AQ maps, war wins and losses? With the recent poor communication on everything else, this not getting released is very much a problem. Can we just get 1 follow through with the promise of better communication? Instead of the normal release going awful and a week later you guys updating to the lowest amount of acceptability and promising to do better going forward only to not do better 30 days later.
Cdub5071
5
