Best Of
Re: At a loss with the summoner fest event
Oh my god the math just came through 😂 since the points can't be farmed, everyone who does anything will have the same points. So the ranked rewards will be based on the amounts of webstore offers you have bought 😂😂You should switch from internet explorer

7
Re: At a loss with the summoner fest event
Lol what? Its the highest currency at the moment, why would someone camp for the alliance rank rewards 🤣I dont particularly care about the radiance in the objectives, and I'm not alone.If you want the radiance you won't camp...So they put points in the "Win X Matches" objectives, which will result in those same people camping?Maybe its because they analyzed data and figured out some people were being scumbags farming the VT for points and didn't want that anymore.Last year's Battlegrounds Realm Event was absolutely nothing like this Realm Event. I placed top 4 overall without spending a single penny.Nothing new really for realm events. Banquet was the exact same.I'm sorry but if there's NO way you can place #1 without having to spend, it's called a PAY TO WIN event.They are unobtainable even if you do pay, unless you also basically do everything. Normally the term pay to win refers to games where either whomever pays the most wins, or spending offers an overwhelming advantage compared to everything else. But that's not really true here, except in an essentially unrealistic extreme. Spending offers an advantage between two players who otherwise are tied in all other respects, but having an advantage between two competitors who otherwise do exactly the same things equally well is not pay to win, that is literally all competitions.There are ranked rewards, which will be unobtainable unless you payI wouldn't call it pay to win. Sure, spending could be a tie breaker for points, but if you don't do everything, especially Raids, no amount of spending is going to catch you up.There are 300,000 total earnable points, so yes you can reach the top milestone, even if you miss a few.Why do you make everything p2w?
Well, technically speaking $24,000 USD might catch you up. But even among the mega whales I suspect the number of people who will actually do that is very close to zero.
Since about a third of the realm points are in Raids, and my alliance doesn't do raids (much less Nightmare Raids which seems to be required to cap out the milestones) I'm basically out of it. But the event is still giving me a ton of rewards for basically just playing the game more or less as I normally do, so I can't be too upset. I find it ... odd that there's so much emphasis on Raids given their presumptive optional nature - and the fact they are tied to alliances, meaning individual players cannot simply choose to do them just for the event - but I suppose Kabam has its reasons there.
I would call that pay to win
Spenders had an advantage which was being able to purchase Units in order to buy elders BUT they still had to play the game AND win BG matches in order to rack up points.
This "Summoner Fest" is an absolute joke towards competition, it's a PAY to WIN event.
I won't be camping, but there definitely will be some that do.
Re: At a loss with the summoner fest event
If you want the radiance you won't camp...So they put points in the "Win X Matches" objectives, which will result in those same people camping?Maybe its because they analyzed data and figured out some people were being scumbags farming the VT for points and didn't want that anymore.Last year's Battlegrounds Realm Event was absolutely nothing like this Realm Event. I placed top 4 overall without spending a single penny.Nothing new really for realm events. Banquet was the exact same.I'm sorry but if there's NO way you can place #1 without having to spend, it's called a PAY TO WIN event.They are unobtainable even if you do pay, unless you also basically do everything. Normally the term pay to win refers to games where either whomever pays the most wins, or spending offers an overwhelming advantage compared to everything else. But that's not really true here, except in an essentially unrealistic extreme. Spending offers an advantage between two players who otherwise are tied in all other respects, but having an advantage between two competitors who otherwise do exactly the same things equally well is not pay to win, that is literally all competitions.There are ranked rewards, which will be unobtainable unless you payI wouldn't call it pay to win. Sure, spending could be a tie breaker for points, but if you don't do everything, especially Raids, no amount of spending is going to catch you up.There are 300,000 total earnable points, so yes you can reach the top milestone, even if you miss a few.Why do you make everything p2w?
Well, technically speaking $24,000 USD might catch you up. But even among the mega whales I suspect the number of people who will actually do that is very close to zero.
Since about a third of the realm points are in Raids, and my alliance doesn't do raids (much less Nightmare Raids which seems to be required to cap out the milestones) I'm basically out of it. But the event is still giving me a ton of rewards for basically just playing the game more or less as I normally do, so I can't be too upset. I find it ... odd that there's so much emphasis on Raids given their presumptive optional nature - and the fact they are tied to alliances, meaning individual players cannot simply choose to do them just for the event - but I suppose Kabam has its reasons there.
I would call that pay to win
Spenders had an advantage which was being able to purchase Units in order to buy elders BUT they still had to play the game AND win BG matches in order to rack up points.
This "Summoner Fest" is an absolute joke towards competition, it's a PAY to WIN event.
Re: VALIANT EVENT QUEST - CHECK IN!
I understand this is a test run, but I have to say none of these changes make sense. You choose 3 Champs, but you can only use one at a time without Degen. Literally the same as swapping one at a time. Fighting the Boss 3 times is completely redundant. The whole Quest seems needlessly tedious, and not in a challenging way.Quest 5 and 6 you gotta fight it 6 times...
So tedious and unnecessary.
Re: VALIANT EVENT QUEST - CHECK IN!
I understand this is a test run, but I have to say none of these changes make sense. You choose 3 Champs, but you can only use one at a time without Degen. Literally the same as swapping one at a time. Fighting the Boss 3 times is completely redundant. The whole Quest seems needlessly tedious, and not in a challenging way.
Re: Spider Woman or Silk?
Spider Woman needs it for damage... Meanwhile she just casually takes 550k hps in a minute at r1:Some takes..... But maybe ...... So something.......Spider Woman needs dupe and is trash in BGs. Easiest choice ever
Spider woman likes the dupe. Not needed. You can say the same about Silk. They're been some bad takes round here, but this might be the worst...
.....
......
......
.....
Silk doesn't need dupe for damage, Spider Woman needs it for damage. Silk ramps up
faster and hits harder. Spider Woman only hits hard after intercepting the opponent's special and even then she only does big damage for one hit...........

Definitely one of the worst takes here, and very ignorant as well lol
Re: No way to reach 100 points in bg now that we start from diamond
Most of us didn't start in v2 last season either. And most of us did fine. Just saying. M
But I would prefer if they extend all three objectives by a week. Its quiet forceful.
I'm strongly considering not bothering about the first week 10k objective.
But I would prefer if they extend all three objectives by a week. Its quiet forceful.
I'm strongly considering not bothering about the first week 10k objective.

13
Re: Plz kabam let us sell relics AGs
Update - got this changed, Relic Awakening Gems no longer have a cap in your inventory*
*except for the guy who “disliked” that for some reason
(Fun fact, I can see who reacts to what)
*except for the guy who “disliked” that for some reason
(Fun fact, I can see who reacts to what)