Best Of
Re: 7 STAR KITTY PRYDE
Honestly very cool homage to one of my favorite covers. Original artist is Jeehyung Lee.
Post your banquet scores and rank here
The most useful data would be:
Precise score
Rank
Bracket (i.e. 11-25%, top 600, etc)
Precise score is better than approximate score for determining things like cutoff and participation levels. I would prefer 109,700 over 119k, but everything helps.
Also, generally speaking you can only find rank before you claim the rewards. The in-game email will probably only list your bracket, not your actual rank. You need to look in your stash. Your rank will be visible where the rewards are listed in your stash. Once you claim the rewards, that information is gone. So if you can, please check rank and include in submission.
Regardless, if you're willing to share, share what you have. It is all appreciated.
Good luck everyone.
Re: 7* skill awakening gem
Since Punisher is unavailable in any way, aside from these Jubilant crystals that go away tomorrow, I'd suggest him
Re: 2025 Banquet Realm Event Progress
There’s akways another milestone. It makes no difference now and I’d rather not know.
Re: 2025 Banquet Realm Event Progress
So that's a very dangerous line Kabam needs to balance on. Now I trust what you just said and I agree with you also, I'd love to know; but Kabam has to account for so many things with this - a handful of players would see it as "Oof, we almost got there, such a cool prize. If only!" some would view it as "Oh… I'm getting us there" while a vocal amount, maybe not even the majority but a non-zero amount of very vocal players would view it as: "Kabam's just trying to bleed us dry, why put that reward there? We'll never get there."
As well as the people who would say: "Ugh, seriously? Just give us the points and get us to that milestone… you did it with the Eidol, so what we can all get a champ everyone thinks is useless but you won't just give us this? #KaScammed."
That's just the unfortunate reality and we all know it.
As for people who didn't/couldn't actually see value in the SBC stretch goals, I couldn't disagree more. The SBC stretch goals were almost perfectly placed and were pretty great incentives to obtain them for a few reasons.
- Guaranteed value
- Created cluster points for players to either push towards or settle at.
- Acted as a discount towards the next stretch goal.
- (I feel most people don't actually appreciate this)
- Guaranteed the value of the next "big" stretch item.
I was actually thrilled when I saw those and I'm being genuine here.
Edit to add: Sorry Crashed, but I'm siding with DNA here. You might be technically right in that it wasn't the actual "last" milestone, the SBC was both the final attained/realized as well as a separate and even more final revealed milestone. So in actuality, Mike deserves a bit of (friendly) ridicule, because yeah, it was an SBC. Lol
Re: Best relic for Jean Grey
I have both domino and magneto 7* relic and testing on Winter Soldier I found the magneto relic helped Jean finish the fight about 3-4 seconds faster. I did 3 fights with each relic to test to get a rough average. So domino was around 40 seconds and 36-37 seconds with Magneto.
Sooo... Use whichever you prefer. I personally go for the bigger sp2 boost with Magneto.
Re: Very specific question regarding the Captain Marvel fight in 9.3.4
Yeah its not about Enchantress... its a feature in CMM's kit- she takes great bonus dmg from energy attacks of Mystic champions. Which means the same exact thing will happen if you use champs like Purgatory and Isophyne against her... to conclude, this wasn't Enchantress' doing
Re: First Appearance Crystal
They did put shiny selector in rank reward, you have to earn that.
And give extra chance to players who are unable to reach that rank reward, this is bonus, and luck based whom you are going to pull, just like every other crystal in the game.
Re: First Appearance Crystal
Congrats on being one of the 16.7% of players that pulled shiny X-23.
Re: 2025 Banquet Realm Event Progress
More ties implies higher density of players, and higher density implies lower scores. So for everyone hoping I was wildly wrong about cutoffs above 1%, this would be a good sign.

