Best Of
Re: Post your banquet scores and rank here
@DNA3000 hopefully helpful. Looks like 104k'ish was the cut-off for 1%. A friend of mine missed it at 102,280 and an alliance mate got it at 104,320.
NARWH4L
Re: As Kabam is generous and fair to us on Mcoc, let's show gratitude to them too.
Bro is the worst of the community
ahmynuts
Obligatory Annual Ronin Post
Here he is, my first R5. All my forums OGs will remember my Ronin posts back in the day (before Allison joined the hype train!). Heβs the best!
Masterpuff
Re: Best science champ to level up R4
For me, it's Quicksilver Vs Nefaria, for questing (answer would be different, for BGs)
Quicksilver at Sig 1 has astonishing utility - if you like him, and you're okay with his double-hit animations, he's a phenomenal champion:
Counters Evade
Counters Unstoppable
Counters Miss
Can parry projectiles
Can auto-evade on intercepts, or when stunned.
Can easily reverse Passive Power Gain with Wither
Good red number damage with Trauma
Huge burst damage with Whiplash.
But Nefaria can do a lot of similar things, too. Again, if you like him and you're good at maximising his Parry-Evade, he's a phenomenal champion, too:
Can almost completely prevent passive Power Gain (and steal it for himself)
Can almost completely prevent regeneration (and at high Sig level, steal it for himself)
Can Evade on Parry, even if the opponent is Unblockable
Huge damage potential on hit, and via Incinerates
Can recover a lot of health on SP1
Has non-contact attacks during his Overload phase
Immune to Bleed
Immune to Power Steal
Functionally almost-immune to Shock and Incinerate
Huge resistance to all Energy and Degeneration damage.
Play around with the two of them, and see who you prefer. Nefaria definitely wants high Sig for his full utility, whereas Quicksilver gets 99% of his at sig1. But either is a great choice.
Re: Post your banquet scores and rank here
Just to clarify:
I am looking for:
Points scored (solo or alliance)
Rank scored in the Realm Event or Alliance Event
Reward BracketΒ
Which ranking you got within your own alliance is not important for this analysis.
And if you choose to submit both, try to indicate which is which. It is not always obvious to me when I'm looking at it.
I am most interested in the solo data because a lot of my analysis references it, but if you're willing to also provide alliance data I will compile it and make it available for reference to anyone who wants to use it themselves.
DNA3000
