Best Of
Re: PRICE THE OFFERS ACCORDING TO THE COUNTRY
If companies do adopt a model like this in less wealthy countries, it's not simply because they can afford to or some act of generosity, it would be because they have analysed that they will get more money from that country by selling more of a product for less (when affordable to more people), than they would selling less of a product for more (when fewer people can afford at the original price). If you were running a company that made digital goods that don't nominally cost anything per item to generate more of, you'd rather sell to 10 people each for $50 than only have one person there be able to afford $100.
1
Re: PRICE THE OFFERS ACCORDING TO THE COUNTRY
I'm aware. How would that be profitable as a company? They have no control over the economy of a country, but accepting much less from some countries is not only bad business, it's a Pandora's Box for problems because their services are much cheaper for some than others.The prices are not within their control. They're all the same price on the part of Kabam, and the platforms adjust them based on local duties and taxes.They are talking about something different. Not taxes and duties but the base price.
Bad for business, i think it would open up the business, food is cheap in my country , a meal could cost you around 4 for 2 people, i dont think it would cost the same in America. Every company that enters a new market for a country allways does some reach on economy and best pricing for the product not just set everything at par with taking a base country to everythingI'm aware. How would that be profitable as a company? They have no control over the economy of a country, but accepting much less from some countries is not only bad business, it's a Pandora's Box for problems because their services are much cheaper for some than others.The prices are not within their control. They're all the same price on the part of Kabam, and the platforms adjust them based on local duties and taxes.They are talking about something different. Not taxes and duties but the base price.
4
Re: PRICE THE OFFERS ACCORDING TO THE COUNTRY
Steam used to do this or still does?People using VPNs to get cheaper prices get banned on steam
But then people started to use VPN to buy games from cheaper regions.
Maybe players would also use VPN to buy webstore deals.
6
Re: PRICE THE OFFERS ACCORDING TO THE COUNTRY
For anyone saying there are complications in having country based prices, just look how other games have implemented it and copy the model.
Re: PRICE THE OFFERS ACCORDING TO THE COUNTRY
i think you kabam should price the games offers qith money to the specific country economy, to what amount can they spend on games and how much is the average pay of someone . The prices are just for US base which becomes expensive for people in developing countriesInfact a lot of popular mobile games do this. Prime example of this is Pokemon go.
13
PRICE THE OFFERS ACCORDING TO THE COUNTRY
i think you kabam should price the games offers qith money to the specific country economy, to what amount can they spend on games and how much is the average pay of someone . The prices are just for US base which becomes expensive for people in developing countries
37
Re: Science Showdown: Spider-Woman vs. Nefaria
This might be Off Topic, But I think This screenshot shows the Nefaria Supremacy....
No Disrespect to Spider Woman, She is OP!
But, When it comes to utility, combined with Damage & Survivability, Nefaria wins

No Disrespect to Spider Woman, She is OP!
But, When it comes to utility, combined with Damage & Survivability, Nefaria wins

Re: Trying to reconcile the “deals are bad” vs “the deals give an unfair advantage” paradox.
3. The unfair advantage: a newly made valiant can just skip all the content I worked my ass for, and get almost the same number of r4s I have for cash. This cheapens my effort, and is due to the fact Kabam skipped a progression level for 7r4s.I agree with all your points but do have to push back on this one.
On the other hand someone who decides to go all in after putting in the work in game will have 14 r4 champs - which will put him way ahead in competitive modes.
These two scenarios just promote FOMO, and might force someone unwilling or unable to spend - to spend nevertheless just to keep up.
Players are a little too precious about the "effort" they put in and thinking that money shouldn't allow a player to achieve equal footing if they didn't put in the same effort.
This is a game - ostensibly it is fun (whether it is in collecting champions, fighting matches, or feeling accomplished by achieving some personal milestone) and wastes some time. While the dopamine hit from rewards and the openings from the rewards is undeniable, there should still be something beyond the rewards itself that most players play this game for.
Theoretically a player that played Necropolis achieved something personally, on top of the rewards. A "new Valiant" player that buys those same rewards does not have that sense of personal achievement. Does it "cheapen your effort"? Only if you think the only point of playing this game/endgame mode is the rewards you end up with.
I do agree with the concern of "needing to spend to keep up", but that is only in competitive modes, and only if you fancy yourself as swimming in that pool. For most players, I would wager that it is not a big concern at all, since most players are not spending enough to where they would be in that high spending cohort. For most players who match up against someone with a similar roster strength, it doesn't matter if you got a 7R3 from Necropolis and they got a 7R3 from buying July 4th offers.
Re: Show your current r4 champs?
I don't really care about BG, which frees up who I consider worthy of r4'ing.Do you think attuma is still worthy to r4? Mine is sig 150 I have invested a lot of sigs on him but donno if he's still good in defense as some champs can completely shut him down and he's bad on bg attack.HOWARD!!!
Only the best
I also have the T7B to r4 another champ, I just don't have the lower materials at the moment since I ranked up a few champs to deal with the last WOF quest. I haven't decided who to rank up, though, other than probably not anyone in either of those three classes. Otherwise Attuma and Deathless She-Hulk would have been obvious choices.
The thing about Attuma is that he's the only one who does what he does. His ability to reverse ability accuracy modifications is nuts. You got one of those nodes that puts a disorient on you whenever you block? Suddenly you can block (and just do stuff in general) even better. Champs that decrease your stun ability accuracy, such as Red Skull when he starts getting armor up buffs? You only stun him more securely. Neutralize making life difficult for your other champs? It'll only make Attuma get more buffs. Tranquilize will make you place more debuffs. Glancing much? Your abilities will just trigger more frequently instead of being unable to trigger at all.
The list goes on and on. Whenever something lowers your ability accuracy to do something, he just does it better instead. This is a piece of utility that I value extremely highly. The other month there was a Baron Zemo boss that I didn't think I had a counter for before I realized that I had Attuma. I just baited out Sp1 after Sp1 from Zemo, each increasing my overall ability accuracy. When he did root me, he just increased the ability accuracy of my unstoppable (and evade, if I had had one) by 50%.
He can just get through so many nodes and abilities that are really quite annoying with every other champion.
5
Re: Easiest way to rank 4 a 7*
Easiest way is being Valiant and doing the super daily event for 270 days choosing t7b shards every day. No hard fights or content required
4

