Best Of
How will the protection change affect parry?
After the change to protection, will this no longer be the case because this is a MASSIVE nerf to EVERY champion since EVERYONE uses parry and not just to those who had 75% block proficiency.
If this is the case, Kabam seriously need to consider revising this change.
Re: Rampant Unchecked Abusive Words in Global Chat and Cheating
Sorry my brains melting. Thought you were defending him
Re: Rampant Unchecked Abusive Words in Global Chat and Cheating
Obviously someone will disagree even if you say "SA is bad". Woww. Typical forums.
Re: Rampant Unchecked Abusive Words in Global Chat and Cheating
You see, this is the problem of freedom of speech. People are allowed to say whatever they want without consequences, including potential child and sex predators. Maybe some restrictions will go a long way, for their own good
Re: onslaught change
DLL explains the daunted and protection interaction at around 4:20 timestamp.
Re: onslaught change
Respectfully, this was not a bug or unintended feature. As some one explained above, protections and resistances have always been additive. That is why a champion with 100% bleed resistance can still take bleed damage if the potency exceeds 100%. Why give resistance instead of immunity if there was not an intended way to still cause damage?
That said, Kabam can of course change the game how they see fit for its health. A point you have raised on numerous occasions so I won’t belabor it. The issue, once again, is that they did it without any communication or player input. Clearly, they knew of this change (ie, that they were going to eventually change how protection works) before the update went live. Unlike the weeks it took for Mike ans Kabam to investigate what was going on with hulkling, he immediately had a well detailed update on the situation yesterday (only after players realized the change). That should have been communicated immediately to the players once known. That’s the scummy behavior players are really mad about.