Best Of
Re: T2 Dust
I'll gladly stand corrected. But what is the point of your post? Where else is the dust supposed to go? Use it or lose it. Kabam thought it would be fun to give players too much and it just isn't working out well for a lot of players unfortunately.
Re: RoL being an obsolete testing ground.
should make ROL 2.0 same defender. But way more hp and no reward. Maybe just maybe a few exp tokens. But honestly a ROL 2.0 Without rewards i wouldn’t mind.
Re: CAIW should have been the first Coliseum fight
Yeah, I've really enjoyed the other three fights, but this one was a huge miss. I actually had more issues in Threat Level 4 than 5. In 5, I had the required combo-focused champions ranked up, so while it took longer than the other fights, I did get him down eventually without too much effort. However, when I then tried doing it with 6*s, I realized that I didn't have any champ ranked up who could ramp up a combo quickly. I have plenty of 6* skill champions ranked up, but none of them build combos in the way that's required for this fight. That started being a thing in that class after I'd moved away from ranking up 6*s, and it meant that I had to get to those 990 hits with normal 5-hit combos. Which was just….ugh.
Requiring a long combo to reach all of those fury passives isn't necessarily a bad idea for the skill class, but I think you would have to cut the required number of hits in that combo drastically. Even Mr. Skill Rank-Up Extraordinaire himself, Stellar-Forged Star-Lord, caps out at 400 hits. Having you ramp twice that and some change (with no other champion being able to even get close to those numbers of hits in that time frame) just seemed needlessly excessive.
I tried using Aegon since he would theoretically reach his max potential at around the same time he'd hit the max number of fury passives, but he had no chance of getting there within the time limit. It just seemed really and strangely restrictive, and it's not like you did enough damage at, say, 20 fury passives that it didn't matter if you never got up to the full 99.
Re: A rant about battlegrounds
Yes yes, people with smaller rosters are pure skills, and monster rosters must be good because they spent money.
If it was all about skill you would have at least 3 7r5s.... What is stopping you from that? You have skills...
Re: So the radiance wont be doubled in this raid week?
I’m not suprise at all. Topical kabam
Re: A rant about battlegrounds
Fixing the mode isn't hard either if you want it to be truly skill expressive.
- Don't tie the mode to personal roster strength, provide everyone a selection of 75-100 champions to build a deck with by season
- Every champion in the deck is at the same rank
- Bring back the health point factor
Shop Improvement for Elder
Re: A rant about battlegrounds
It would be a problem in not having a game to play at all
Re: A rant about battlegrounds
Seriously what’s keeping people doing content to improve your roster?
Even FTPs now have up to 4 7* rank 5s and a full deck of r4s now.
I’m not a fan of this season’s meta, but it’s an open competition where you fight people in your bracket.