Best Of
Re: Rant: The problem with “BG brainrot” and How it Has Distorted Champion Evaluation in MCOC
Agree with you.
What disappoints me the most is, haven’t we all learned to not decide on a champ just based on first impression? Content creators wrote off a ton of champs that they changed their minds on, we just don’t know how good or fun a champ will be this early. Even people who make and maintain their tier lists are still moving around and debating where champs that are YEARS old should go, because they’ve heard or seen different things. Let’s just be excited the champ is here and wait and see just how good they are in different game modes.
Rant: The problem with “BG brainrot” and How it Has Distorted Champion Evaluation in MCOC
In recent months, Marvel Contest of Champions has witnessed a growing shift in how champions are perceived and evaluated, one that increasingly prioritizes speed and performance in a single game mode: Battlegrounds.
While competitive modes deserve recognition for their strategic, competitive and fast-paced appeal, the community’s growing obsession with whether a champion can finish fights in under 30 or 40 seconds has created a distorted and frankly frustrating environment, both for players and for the game’s broader design philosophy, and I have evidence of this
Nowhere is this more evident than in the reaction to champions like Blue Marvel, a rather complex, utility-driven character with ramp-up mechanics, nuanced counters, and later usage potential across Story Quests, Alliance War, Incursions, Coliseum, and the new AQ format.. Despite his unique strengths and the initial hype for such a powerful character, early reactions on the official forums and social platforms are currently dominated by disappointment, not because of flaws in his kit, but simply because he did not fit the mold of a “Battlegrounds monster.” Posts revealing his spotlight received dislikes within minutes, clearly reflecting a knee-jerk dismissal rooted in a one-dimensional evaluation standard.
What’s worse is that even many content creators. some of whom are typically thoughtful and analytical, like Lagacy, have started falling into this meta trap. Content that focuses on 30 second nukes, “god-tier” Battlegrounds champions, and hyper-optimized matchups inevitably generates more views, clicks, and engagement. As a result, even considerably good champions with situational value are often ignored or outright labeled as “mid” if they don’t meet that BG standard, regardless of how impactful they might be in other parts of the game.
But this mindset doesn’t just promote inaccurate takes, it actively takes away the core of what makes MCOC special: its strategic depth, champion diversity, and wide-ranging content. Champions should be judged by how many areas of the game they contribute to, not how fast they can secure a win in a single, time-sensitive mode. For example, champions like Cull Obsidian might appear impressive on paper due to raw damage output, but they fall apart entirely in nodes like Polka Dot Power, where power gain is tied to DOT effects, something he completely lacks. This proves that “meta” status is fragile and entirely dependent on context.
Moreover, the idea that only meta champions are worth ranking up is simply unsustainable. It leads to rosters bloated with glass cannons and nuke champions, but with glaring weaknesses when faced with niche nodes, complex boss fights, or utility-heavy encounters. Smart players understand that true roster strength comes from coverage — from having options. Options that aren’t always trendy. Options that aren’t always flashy. But options that work.
A champion isn’t “bad” because they’re not in the top 5 of a tier list. A champion is bad when they offer no unique utility, no relevant matchup value, and no practical place in any major content. That bar is far lower than what the current discourse suggests. And by ignoring that nuance, we lose out on creative team-building, smart counters, and the satisfaction of finding overlooked champions that shine in the right situation.
It’s time for the community, some content creators included, to break free of the Battlegrounds echo chamber. The Contest is vast with evolving metas, rotating nodes, and a need for strategic depth. Let’s stop asking only how fast a champion is. Let’s start asking where they shine, and why that still matters
Sincerely, your friendly but disillusioned MCOC player
PS: I know I will get a lot of hate for this post, but let them try. Let the hate flow through them
Is your war rating 3600-3650? Please share your rating and tier.
We’re gonna grab a second win against an alliance 58 points below us, but we’re habitually being matched way up or way down. I’m curious about where the cutoff is, roughly.
Re: Blue Marvel Kit Predictions
Shame, I don't get why they insist on making the obscure ones nobody knows about like Nico and Karolina extremely powerful and then the fan favorites like Lizard and Blue Marvel just meh. I get that power scaling in this game doesn't make sense but just why? They know what people are expecting from fan favorite characters at least make an effort ffs, and I'm not saying BGs is everything but how much long form content do we even have right now? Coliseum and that's it, WoF was genuinely **** so I know for a fact we're not getting any other new type of long form content for a while cause the last one was a massive flop with mid rewards.
Anyways yeah at least he said it, he's not good for BGs unless there's something helping him ramp.
Re: M’Baku or Blue Marvel? Who are you more excited for?
Let them huff copium for a few days they'll move on eventually lol just look at Northstar
Re: Incursions Write Up
I already have. I just honestly don't know why they would be on your team? Medusa for robots? Angela will have them down before a problem is even needed? For Nick, I'm assuming you'd be a fan of hemostatic charge, of which you'll have to split some hacks between him and the rest of your team. So I'm genuinely curious why you would bring them, especially if all of them are r4.
Re: M’Baku or Blue Marvel? Who are you more excited for?
Originally i thought i was gonna be more shooting for blue marvel but m’baku looks amazing and looks like a fun champ to play so i think im gonna be hoping for him more obviously i want them both though. M’baku just seems like he got closer to what he would be like in real life and blue marvel kinda seemed like they held back on his true potential but hopefully im wrong. I just kinda see a photon sentry mix in blue marvels kit
Re: M’Baku or Blue Marvel? Who are you more excited for?
M’baku seems like they took Aegon’s kit, put it into shortform content filter, and then added the trendy “bank damage taken during fight.” Feels odd to me, like blasphemy against Aegon.
Blue Marvel’s kit seems more appealing to me, and I’m always a sucker for persistent mechanics. Definitely is less annoying than Sentry’s playstyle but BM’s indestructible mechanic seemstoo niche.
Re: M’Baku or Blue Marvel? Who are you more excited for?
He’s mid, literally just a worse version of photon🥀💔
Re: Elder difficulty
The stream said it's still with Devs, they've changed the layout but not added skip to elder ...