Best Of

doesn’t really matter since they don’t say exactly why you get banned. It might’ve been for something not even in that video or having to do with that specific fight

Well damn… then I've just wasted a bunch of boosts yesterday and today then.

Good to know. Pretty sh**ty to make it seem like you can use boosts though. Just messy.

I agree it seems really unfair. I’ve only twelve 7* champs so far and only four of them are above r1 and none of them at r4. I keep getting matched with accounts that have at 15-20 or more r4 champs. I might win 1 out of every 20 or 30 matches. I started out at the beginning of the season at bronze five and here it is end of the season and I’m only at gold one and I play a lot everyday.

Sounds really nice. Well-balanced.

Personally, I always wanted the effects of his SP2 and SP3 switched. I mean, he literally throws a burning fireball on his SP2, but it's the SP3 that causes Incinerate?

How about doing the switch, so the opponent gets Incinerate + Stun?

Then instead of tying the anti-Miss specifically to his SP2, give Rhulk the ability 'cannot Miss Incinerated opponents'; which gives a little balance to make him less powerful against Incinerate-immune champs, but could also be fun in places like Incursions?

Because it has been proven in previous iterations of matchmaking that lining up accounts by deck/account size gives smaller accounts the easiest path to rewards. Last time matchmaking was like that, UC accounts were making the circuit with ease and Paragon accounts were struggling. That isn't fair when everyone is after the same rewards.

So there is a limit on how good we are supposed to be?

The reason is it’s a competitive mode with everyone fighting for the same rewards. Small accounts versus small accounts would need to have small rewards.

I found this season particularly tough. Then I asked myself, why do I care?

Unranked - face players with similar accounts

Ranked - face anyone in your current tier