Best Of
Re: Some clarification on the recent ban wave
I've never seen such a ridiculous game, where the cheaters are lifted and the non-cheaters are still waiting for the countdown.

7
Re: Is Kabam ignoring f2p players completely?
As a non arena grinding F2p, I don't support this threads claims.
Re: Wheel Of Fate--What Went Wrong?
They said it was aspirational content, so the way it's structured isn't an issue with that in mind. The real problem is the rewards are only barely relevant for right now. In a few weeks/months the rewards will be severely outdated so the whole the aspirational aspect is thrown out the window from the get go."Aspirational content" as if pulling specific champions isn't complete rng, so we're aspiring for good luck now?
Fix the rewards so it stays relevant and worth the time and resource investment for a long time and a lot of the problems go away.
Re: "Boycotts, Criticism Vids, Blatant Greed, Rigged A.I"...Shush cause you'll still spend'- Kabam Team
Oh the B word again...yuck

-9
Re: Show Me Your Oddball R4s
I have 3 rank 4s right now. Onslaught, sig 200 Overseer, which is a bit odd. But I don't think you guys will have ever seen one of these!!
She is my most recent r4 and probably my favourite

She is my most recent r4 and probably my favourite

Re: Savaş alanları
Artık küçük hesapların karşısına büyük hesapların çıkarılmasından nefret ediyorum bunu bir türlü çözemediniz çözmekte istemiyorsunuzSinirini daha fazla körüklemek istemem, ama savas alanlarındaki karşılaşma, hesap boyutuna göre değil, bulunduğun tiere göre yapiliyor. Yani. Eğer v5 teysen, karsina v5ten bir rakip cikacak. Eğer yenmekte zorlaniyorsan zaten en başta oraya ait degilsindir.
The matchmaking system for BG's are based on what tier you're on. Not according to your rooster..
For example, if you're in V5, you'll get someone in V5. If you're not able to beat them, maybe you don't belong there to start with.

1
Re: Wheel of Fate rewards
I hate this content as much as anyone, but some of these comments are coping about the rewards.There's always forever have been a battle between.
The rewards are very good, and if all this stuff was offered for 5k units it would be a ridiculously amazing deal.
It's like, you can choose not to do the content because it sucks, without pretending that the rewards are trash or misrepresenting what they actually are.

Whiny Community
VS
Money Hungry Kabam

Since LHS = RHS

Re: Wheel of Fate rewards
I hate this content as much as anyone, but some of these comments are coping about the rewards.Sure, if it was for 5k units without any extra time or effort investment,
The rewards are very good, and if all this stuff was offered for 5k units it would be a ridiculously amazing deal.
It's like, you can choose not to do the content because it sucks, without pretending that the rewards are trash or misrepresenting what they actually are.
With how difficult the content is, the tightness of the tag requirements, and the rank ups you’d have to do to beat it, these rewards are far from worth it.
Epoch and 9.2 exploration are more feasible than this, and give better rewards, save for the selector.
Re: 7* Human Torch in wheel of fortune?
MY BAD. Truly.Dust is in the selector.So what’s the reason for Dust not being in the selector? Was this designed before she was in the game?Human Torch is not available to be owned until the end of the month; this is what I meant by that.The Selector consists of the Champions who exist at the time of the content's releaseSo that was a lie, seeing as how Human Torch literally is coded into the game right now lmmaaooo.At the very least say, sorry guys we messed up. This isn’t what we intended. Instead the response to a lie is to follow it up with another lie?
Human Torch and Thor Ragnarok are not inluded
The word "lie" is being thrown around very liberally here.
I have stated, in this thread, that it was a poor way to word how the selector works on my part at the moment on stream.
Because that might explain a lot about the quality of the design…
Re: 7* Human Torch in wheel of fortune?
If it truly were a mistake, it should have been clarified immediately after the stream. If you did that, no one would be upset. People misspeak, I get it. But your job is literally communicating information that Kabam has, and we don't. When you let those types of statements linger without correction, you lose credibility.There is quite literally zero benefit in trying to intentionally misdirect anybody, about anything -This goes beyond "I worded it poorly." At the time, you knew full well who the defenders were, we didn't. At the time, you knew Thor Rags and HT were defenders. We didn't. At the time, you said, without caveat or reservation, that all 12 defenders were in the selector. At the time, you explicitly said Deathless Thanos would not be in the selector, showing that you knew full well how to explain the limitations of the selector to exclude certain champs.Human Torch is not available to be owned until the end of the month; this is what I meant by that.The Selector consists of the Champions who exist at the time of the content's releaseSo that was a lie, seeing as how Human Torch literally is coded into the game right now lmmaaooo.At the very least say, sorry guys we messed up. This isn’t what we intended. Instead the response to a lie is to follow it up with another lie?
Human Torch and Thor Ragnarok are not inluded
The word "lie" is being thrown around very liberally here.
I have stated, in this thread, that it was a poor way to word how the selector works on my part at the moment on stream.
Yet despite all this, you stated unequivocally that all 12 defenders were in the selector.
That's not an "oopsie." That's intentional misrepresentation and misdirection.
Genuinely zero.
I did not say: "Hey, Torch is in the selector."
If I did, everything you're saying here would be 1000% correct.
In the moment, I accidentally said there was a selector with one of the 12 Champions, instead of saying there was a selector made up of Champions in the quest.
It was a mistake, and that was made known immediately when the content went live, and I realized that.
There isn't more I can do for you here aside from apologize for the mistake and take accountability for making it.
These will be my last words on the matter.
I really want to believe you when you share information, but you're making that so difficult to do. Even assuming the situation in a light most favorable to you and with the benefit of the doubt in your direction, you gave us materially wrong information that you failed to correct until you were confronted about it directly.
How am I supposed to trust that what you're telling me, about anything, is correct?