Best Of

They should’ve made all the champs 7*R4 so we could see what they’re capable of, even champs that aren’t even 7* we would finally get a good preview and they’d hear our feedback better on who should be next 7* but nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo 2* and nothing have fun gambling so stupid and pointless

That would have made this honestly impossible to do. We're giving out the 52 2*s, maxed out, and you can keep them. Obviously cannot do that with 7 stars, and doing it a different way would have made the mode infeasible to get in.

Will be collecting up and passing along feedback on the mode, but giving everyone 52 7*s is just not practical haha

That’s completely fair. However if you removed the whole “giving everyone the maxed 2*” you could’ve avoided the having to give us them and just let us play with them. Maybe that requires so much more technical and code awareness that I have but that’s something I think most players would’ve preferred, find a way to let us play as them without giving them to us.

come back here and say that again in a couple of months when they officially release this game mode with only 7* decks without giving any

So we finally discovered what you believe to be competitive. Totally RNG-based, grind-focused content. Got it. Please spare us any future posts from you about BGs.

Read what I said in the last sentence. For a mode to be Competitive there has to be a level playing field which this mode does by giving everyone the same access to champs. Nobody is locked out of competing just because they don't have the champs or have them leveled up. I am consistently getting 900 points every reset by using the same strategy every time. You complain about it being too RNG focused yet BGs is literally the exact same and even worse.

First you have to get the champ, then you have to get the resources to rank them up, and finally you have to make sure you draft them. All of this is RNG that even requires money to achive.

The reason why I said a 2 star meta is because kabam doesn't have the technology to make it so your roster in one mode is separate from your roster in the main game. If I said kabam should give us 52 seven stars fully maxed out for a BGs meta they couldn't do that without actually giving those champs to keep permanently. Obviously there will be attacker and defender nodes along with the usual rules that will boost the health values so that fights wouldn't be done in 10 seconds.

When everyone has access to the same character all at max rank, the only deciding factor is who plays better not who spent the most.

Dreadful logic.

I imagine we can’t call the premier league competitive then because some football clubs are richer, and spend more on players than others..

I would say its more a single player mode with a competitive element than a straight up competitive mode. After all its the side quest still, but with an added leader board element. There is strategy and decision making in terms of how many swaps you do and when you do them, but yes also rng plays its role for sure.

Are you expecting this release this type of game mode on a permanent basis?

The plan is more that we'll have more variety in side quests and be able to swap between more diverse varieties. Want to combat the current status of side quests feeling a little stale and repetitive.

But the new event gets stale and repetitive after you figure out what's expected and do it once. And also it lacks any fighting mechanics, but has all the new type of card interactions that probably took noticable time to code.
I'd rather play something like that thing for top progression level where you swap champs every 3 fights. Add some rng there, like start with a limited deck like bg and give selection of 3 champs from 5-8 and then lock used champs for several 3 fights sections with random nodes or defenders. Or just challenging fights with objectives like it was for suffering season. Or just say that this month sq is arena, imo it would be somewhat similar to the new mode (I never play arena except since special events)

And thats fair feedback! Ultimately gotta try things and see what folks think. Seeing lots of positive reception once folks are able to play it but also want to get this kind of constructive feedback too to make it better!

This is an amazing game mode, yes, and all summoners liked a lot.

Hope Kabam add to the game from now on ...

With 1 stars and 3 stars will be awesome too!

But, if we have something like this up to four to seven stars ,no other game will match Marvel Contest of Champions 🥳

So we finally discovered what you believe to be competitive. Totally RNG-based, grind-focused content. Got it. Please spare us any future posts from you about BGs.

Read what I said in the last sentence. For a mode to be Competitive there has to be a level playing field which this mode does by giving everyone the same access to champs. Nobody is locked out of competing just because they don't have the champs or have them leveled up. I am consistently getting 900 points every reset by using the same strategy every time. You complain about it being too RNG focused yet BGs is literally the exact same and even worse.

First you have to get the champ, then you have to get the resources to rank them up, and finally you have to make sure you draft them. All of this is RNG that even requires money to achive.

The reason why I said a 2 star meta is because kabam doesn't have the technology to make it so your roster in one mode is separate from your roster in the main game. If I said kabam should give us 52 seven stars fully maxed out for a BGs meta they couldn't do that without actually giving those champs to keep permanently. Obviously there will be attacker and defender nodes along with the usual rules that will boost the health values so that fights wouldn't be done in 10 seconds.

When everyone has access to the same character all at max rank, the only deciding factor is who plays better not who spent the most.

Dreadful logic.

I imagine we can’t call the premier league competitive then because some football clubs are richer, and spend more on players than others..

I would say its more a single player mode with a competitive element than a straight up competitive mode. After all its the side quest still, but with an added leader board element. There is strategy and decision making in terms of how many swaps you do and when you do them, but yes also rng plays its role for sure.

Are you expecting this release this type of game mode on a permanent basis?

The plan is more that we'll have more variety in side quests and be able to swap between more diverse varieties. Want to combat the current status of side quests feeling a little stale and repetitive.

But the new event gets stale and repetitive after you figure out what's expected and do it once. And also it lacks any fighting mechanics, but has all the new type of card interactions that probably took noticable time to code.
I'd rather play something like that thing for top progression level where you swap champs every 3 fights. Add some rng there, like start with a limited deck like bg and give selection of 3 champs from 5-8 and then lock used champs for several 3 fights sections with random nodes or defenders. Or just challenging fights with objectives like it was for suffering season. Or just say that this month sq is arena, imo it would be somewhat similar to the new mode (I never play arena except since special events)

And thats fair feedback! Ultimately gotta try things and see what folks think. Seeing lots of positive reception once folks are able to play it but also want to get this kind of constructive feedback too to make it better!

This is an amazing game mode, yes, and all summoners liked a lot.

Hope Kabam add to the game from now on ...

With 1 stars and 3 stars will be awesome too!

But, if we have something like this up to four to seven stars ,no other game will match Marvel Contest of Champions 🥳

Damn bro that’s a great call. This would be totally different with three stars.

So we finally discovered what you believe to be competitive. Totally RNG-based, grind-focused content. Got it. Please spare us any future posts from you about BGs.

Read what I said in the last sentence. For a mode to be Competitive there has to be a level playing field which this mode does by giving everyone the same access to champs. Nobody is locked out of competing just because they don't have the champs or have them leveled up. I am consistently getting 900 points every reset by using the same strategy every time. You complain about it being too RNG focused yet BGs is literally the exact same and even worse.

First you have to get the champ, then you have to get the resources to rank them up, and finally you have to make sure you draft them. All of this is RNG that even requires money to achive.

The reason why I said a 2 star meta is because kabam doesn't have the technology to make it so your roster in one mode is separate from your roster in the main game. If I said kabam should give us 52 seven stars fully maxed out for a BGs meta they couldn't do that without actually giving those champs to keep permanently. Obviously there will be attacker and defender nodes along with the usual rules that will boost the health values so that fights wouldn't be done in 10 seconds.

When everyone has access to the same character all at max rank, the only deciding factor is who plays better not who spent the most.

Dreadful logic.

I imagine we can’t call the premier league competitive then because some football clubs are richer, and spend more on players than others..

I would say its more a single player mode with a competitive element than a straight up competitive mode. After all its the side quest still, but with an added leader board element. There is strategy and decision making in terms of how many swaps you do and when you do them, but yes also rng plays its role for sure.

Are you expecting this release this type of game mode on a permanent basis?

The plan is more that we'll have more variety in side quests and be able to swap between more diverse varieties. Want to combat the current status of side quests feeling a little stale and repetitive.

But the new event gets stale and repetitive after you figure out what's expected and do it once. And also it lacks any fighting mechanics, but has all the new type of card interactions that probably took noticable time to code.
I'd rather play something like that thing for top progression level where you swap champs every 3 fights. Add some rng there, like start with a limited deck like bg and give selection of 3 champs from 5-8 and then lock used champs for several 3 fights sections with random nodes or defenders. Or just challenging fights with objectives like it was for suffering season. Or just say that this month sq is arena, imo it would be somewhat similar to the new mode (I never play arena except since special events)

And thats fair feedback! Ultimately gotta try things and see what folks think. Seeing lots of positive reception once folks are able to play it but also want to get this kind of constructive feedback too to make it better!

This is an amazing game mode, yes, and all summoners liked a lot.

Hope Kabam add to the game from now on ...

With 1 stars and 3 stars will be awesome too!

But, if we have something like this up to four to seven stars ,no other game will match Marvel Contest of Champions 🥳

Did this donut really just ask for a bunch of max sig 7* for free towards the end? LMFAOOOOAOAAISJ

Have you looked at how the scoring work, buddy? It’s who plays the most, not who plays the best. Although I’m sure you’re about to tell us that you’ve pioneered a strategy that guarantees 900 points every round, right?

I think the mode is fine and I’m sure some people find it to be a low-engagement alternative to arenas. But to champion it as the COMPETITIVE mode we’ve all been waiting for is just laughable.

I never said it was the competitive mode we have all been waiting for. I just said it was an actual fair competitive mode.

BGs isn't about who played the best, it's about who has the better roster and who drafted better. You can't pay your way to the top in the new mode but you definitely can in BGs.

It's obvious you are not reading what I'm writing and just want to hate.

You can't pay your way to the top of BGs, y'know. Do you play BGs? If you get anyway into GC you'll see just how many whales there are hardstuck in the low ranks because they have more money than skill.

BGs is highly reliant on skill AND your roster. This new mode is only reliant on rng and time/energy spent grinding. And it isn't competitive, you're just grinding for rewards with a ranked reward system as a bonus. Calling it competitive would be like calling summoner advancement a competitive event.

Have you looked at how the scoring work, buddy? It’s who plays the most, not who plays the best. Although I’m sure you’re about to tell us that you’ve pioneered a strategy that guarantees 900 points every round, right?

I think the mode is fine and I’m sure some people find it to be a low-engagement alternative to arenas. But to champion it as the COMPETITIVE mode we’ve all been waiting for is just laughable.

I never said it was the competitive mode we have all been waiting for. I just said it was an actual fair competitive mode.

BGs isn't about who played the best, it's about who has the better roster and who drafted better. You can't pay your way to the top in the new mode but you definitely can in BGs.

It's obvious you are not reading what I'm writing and just want to hate.

So we finally discovered what you believe to be competitive. Totally RNG-based, grind-focused content. Got it. Please spare us any future posts from you about BGs.

Read what I said in the last sentence. For a mode to be Competitive there has to be a level playing field which this mode does by giving everyone the same access to champs. Nobody is locked out of competing just because they don't have the champs or have them leveled up. I am consistently getting 900 points every reset by using the same strategy every time. You complain about it being too RNG focused yet BGs is literally the exact same and even worse.

First you have to get the champ, then you have to get the resources to rank them up, and finally you have to make sure you draft them. All of this is RNG that even requires money to achive.

The reason why I said a 2 star meta is because kabam doesn't have the technology to make it so your roster in one mode is separate from your roster in the main game. If I said kabam should give us 52 seven stars fully maxed out for a BGs meta they couldn't do that without actually giving those champs to keep permanently. Obviously there will be attacker and defender nodes along with the usual rules that will boost the health values so that fights wouldn't be done in 10 seconds.

When everyone has access to the same character all at max rank, the only deciding factor is who plays better not who spent the most.